Given this fact, it is completely obvious that Arabs could not be responsible for the collapse. Anyone responsible would have to have had intimate access to the buildings for an extended period of time. Did a group of Arabs or “Al Qaeda” have complete access to the World Trade Center? Of course not. Especially not enough access to wire three entire skyscrapers with military-grade explosives. Even if they were able to accomplish this, why would it be necessary to fly planes into the buildings? After realizing the obvious, the entire official 9/11 story falls on its face.

Who did have access to the buildings? For starters, the WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein, who happened to collect several billion dollars in insurance money from the attacks. There were also over 60 Israeli Mossad agents arrested in the WTC area, who were silently released and flown back to Israel. Please visit our terrorism page and watch the videos there. You will see the astonishing involvement of American and Israeli Jews in the 9/11 events.

Sabrosky even claims to be part Jewish himself. He notes that if the American public, and especially the rank and file U.S. military, ever found out Israel was behind this attack that it would be the end of Israel. It is not every day that a former high-ranking U.S. military official comes out and says that Israel did 9/11. But as more and more evidence becomes available, more people are realizing the truth.

There are basically three crowds of people: those that believe the official 9/11 story and support Israel to the bitter end; those that realize the official 9/11 story is bogus but instead blame the U.S. government for pulling it off; and then there are those that have not been afraid to come to the most evidenced-based and logical conclusion. The first group is comprised mostly of mindless moronic drones who will believe anything if you wave an American flag in their face. These people usually have an easy time finding a job in the mainstream conservative media. The second group are usually liberals who have an axe to grind against the Bush administration or the military contractors, and think the whole scam was done for war profits. Both of these groups are scared shitless of ever sounding “anti-Semitic” and therefore lapse into lunacy when possible Jewish involvement is mentioned. The third and final group comprise those who have not only objectively seen the overwhelmingly Jewish involvement in 9/11, but have also possessed the intelligence to examine Jewish cohesive involvement in other historical events and movements. The fact that 9/11 was and still is being used as an excuse for the U.S. to attack Israel’s enemies is by no means coincidental.

Again, I invite you to view the videos in our terrorism page to gain a base of knowledge about this subject. However, it appears Jewish involvement in these events goes far beyond what these videos can show you. So, please watch the videos below and research as much as you can. Then ask yourself, “could such an operation be pulled off by a random group of money-seeking individuals with no common goal, or was this event used to catapult the United States into a never-ending crusade against those who threaten Jewish ethnocentrism?” Enjoy these videos:

Zionism Unmasked:
The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalism

By Dr. Alan Sabrosky

11 March, 2010 Sabbah.biz

Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu once remarked to a Likud gathering that “Israel is not like other countries.” Oddly enough for him, that time he was telling the truth, and nowhere is that more evident than with Jewish nationalism, whether or not one pins the “Zionist” label on it.

Nationalism in most countries and cultures can have both positive and negative aspects, unifying a people and sometimes leading them against their neighbors. Extremism can emerge, and often has, at least in part in almost every nationalist/independence movement I can recall (e.g., the French nationalist movement had The Terror, Kenya’s had the Mau Mau, etc.).

But whereas extremism in other nationalist movements is an aberration, extremism in Jewish nationalism is the norm, pitting Zionist Jews (secular or observant) against the goyim (everyone else), who are either possible predator or certain prey, if not both sequentially. This does not mean that all Jews or all Israelis feel and act this way, by any means. But it does mean that Israel today is what it cannot avoid being, and what it would be under any electable government (a point I’ll develop in another article).

The differences between Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and that of other countries and cultures here I think are fourfold:

Zionism is a real witches’ brew of xenophobia, racism, ultra-nationalism, and militarism that places it way outside of a “mere” nationalist context — for example, when I was in Ireland (both parts) I saw no indication whatsoever that the PIRAs or anyone else pressing for a united Ireland had a shred of design on shoving Protestants into camps or out of the country, although there may well have been a handful who thought that way — and goes far beyond the misery for others professed by the Nazis

Zionism undermines civic loyalty among its adherents in other countries in a way that other nationalist movements (and even ultra-nationalist movements like Nazism) did not — e.g., a large majority of American Jews, including those who are not openly dual citizens, espouse a form of political bigamy called “dual loyalty” (to Israel & the US) that is every bit as dishonest as marital bigamy, attempts to finesse the precedence they give to Israel over the US (lots of Rahm Emanuels out there who served in the IDF but NOT in the US armed forces), and has absolutely no parallel in the sense of national or cultural identity espoused by any other definable ethnic or racial group in America — even the Nazi Bund in the US disappeared once Germany and the US went to war, with almost all of its members volunteering for the US armed forces

The “enemy” of normal nationalist movements is the occupying power and perhaps its allies, and once independence is achieved, normal relations with the occupying power are truly the norm, but for Zionism almost everyone out there is an actual or potential enemy, differing only in proximity and placement on its very long list of enemies (which is now America’s target list) and

Almost all nationalist movements (including the irredentist and secessionist variants) intend to create an independent state from a population in place or to reunite a separated people (like the Sudeten Germans in the 1930s) — it is very rare for it to include the wholesale displacement of another indigenous population, which is far more common of successful colonialist movements as in the US — and perhaps a reason why most Americans wouldn’t care too much about what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians even if they DID know about it, is because that is no different than what Europeans in North America did to the Indians/Native Americans here in a longer & more low-tech fashion.

The implications of this for Middle East peace prospects, and for other countries in thrall to their domestic Jewish lobbies or not, are chilling. The Book of Deuteronomy come to life in a state with a nuclear arsenal would be enough to give pause to anyone not bought or bribed into submission — which these days encompasses the US Government, given Israel’s affinity for throwing crap into the face of the Obama administration and Obama’s visible affinity for accepting it with a smile, Bibi Netanyahu’s own “Uncle Tom” come to Washington.

The late General Moshe Dayan, who — Zionist or not — remains an honored part of my own Pantheon of military heroes, allegedly observed that Israel’s security depended on its being viewed by others as a mad dog. He may have been correct. But he neglected to note that the preferred response of everyone else is to kill that mad dog before it can decide to go berserk and bite. It is an option worth considering.

Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. He can be contacted at docbrosk@comcast.net

Savage starts out by criticizing those who are currently buying guns and ammunition. Then he reiterates how we should all be going after “islamists” instead. It gets interesting when Savage states that he believes this whole militia fiasco was orchestrated by the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center). It has now been released that an undercover FBI agent infiltrated the Hutaree militia and thereby passed on information regarding their plans. Don’t forget, the SPLC has been feeding false propaganda to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alluding to a “violent conservative threat” for some time now. Read an analysis of their despicable report here.

A retired federal agent then calls the radio show and voices his support for the government’s actions. He explains that in these cases only “perception” matters, not what the actual “threat” may be. Savage claims these guys were not a real threat at all. The caller explains that in his experience the threat level is immaterial and irrelevant. Once a violation is committed, no matter how it was provoked, it all then becomes “perception” and a warrant can be obtained. Savage plays an audio clip of the SPLC’s Mark Potok, where he claims that the Hutaree were going to lure “hundreds and hundreds” of police officers to a funeral and use IED’s and “missiles” to kill them all! How in the hell would these guys get missiles?!! Does this agitating Jew really expect us to believe such nonsense?

If you notice the picture of these militia members, they look like they have a combined IQ of about 300 between the eight of them, yet Potok wants us to believe they have the ability to obtain and operate missiles! How would he know this? He’s the only person I’ve heard talk about the Hutaree’s plans to use missiles. He’s either making this up or he is being given info from the fed’s, which means they’re working together. Savage asks the caller how in the world these clowns would ever get missiles. He honestly replies by stating that the only way is if the government agent offered to get missiles for the group, (i.e. entrapment). Entrapment apparently isn’t a valid defense, so the government can basically try to pin anything they want on you. So in this case, Potok would know about the “missiles” if he was working with the feds (sharing information etc.) and therefore would know about the entrapment ploy. Savage is correct to be suspicious of the SPLC having inside information about this investigation so soon after it happened. Of course Potok may just be making up this whole “missile” story, knowing that the media would never call him on it.

Because of these strange events, Savage and the caller then discuss the very real possibility of the government agent actually provoking the whole incident. The agent was obviously the only one who could have realistically suggested the use of missiles, and therefore could have also suggested the very idea of using violence against police officers. This would sound far fetched, except we have seen this in countless other previous scenarios. In the Ruby Ridge incident, a government agent solicited Randy Weaver to make sawed-off shotguns. They then arrested him and mailed him the wrong court date.  When he didn’t show, they proceeded to surround his house with snipers and opened fire on his innocent family. Dozens of women and children were burned to death when the feds attacked Waco, also under false pretenses. The government and media devised rumors of child abuse etc., much of which turned out to be false. Let’s not even mention what a disaster 9/11 was. Couple this with their lies about WW2 and the Holocaust, the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty, the Gulf of Tonkin, Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, etc., and the idea of entrapping a few clueless militia members does not fall outside the realm of possibilities. Also keep in mind that this incident just happens to arise right after the passage of Obama’s health care bill, and the media has been whipping up a frenzy about “anger on the right.”

It is important to realize the primary purpose of organizations like the SPLC, the ADL, etc. Their goal is to use propaganda and intimidation to frighten white people into submission. They launch countless lawsuits and endlessly propagate lies through the media in order keep white people from resisting everything that is being done to them. Any type of resistance whatsoever is met with slurs and condemnation, until most of the white population is too afraid to defend their race and country.  With all the articles I’ve read in the past few days regarding this incident, almost every one of them quotes an official from the SPLC. Why is that? Why does the media always look to them as an unbiased authoritative source? Furthermore, why is it always Jewish organizations who lead these campaigns? It’s a very simple question really, but it is important for you to think about it carefully. If Jews are such good friends to us white folks, like the media tells us, then why do they make it their top priority to destroy all pro-white sentiment in America?

We are told by our media that this immigration must take place in order for our economy to “keep growing.” Oh really? So how exactly did economies historically function when there was a lack of immigration? Did they just grind to a halt? What was the American middle-class standard of living in 1960 compared to what it is today? The answers to these simple questions show that if massive non-white immigration is needed for our economy, then maybe the structure of our economy is entirely wrong.

Frustrated with the time it has taken for this issue to re-enter the spotlight, illegal alien activist groups held a massive march on Washington this past Sunday. As noted in the article below, many Jewish groups were involved with the rally:

Jewish Groups Join March for Immigration Reform 

American Jewish groups were among 200,000 protesters in Washington demanding comprehensive immigration reform in the United States.

Under the banner of We Were Strangers, Too-the Jewish Campaign for Immigration Reform, Jewish groups including the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism were among the marchers on March 21 from the Hillel International offices in Chinatown joining the protesters on the National Mall.

The rally was organized by Reform Immigration for America Campaign, a coalition of immigrants’ rights groups that want to make immigration reform a top priority for lawmakers in 2010. The cause was put on the back burner as U.S. lawmakers tackled the health care debate.

HIAS and the American Jewish Committee have voiced their support for the Refugee Protection Act of 2010 introduced earlier this month by U.S. Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Carl Levin (Jew) (D-Mich.). The legislation is aimed at improving protections and rights of refugees and asylum seekers.

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=8707

The “We Were Strangers Too” campaign is organized by the HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) and endorsed by many of the largest Jewish organizations in America.  Check out the HIAS homepage here.  A hysterically cheesy promotional video of the campaign was released by the Jewish Council on Urban Affairs.  Check out their website here, and notice their propaganda about “social justice” (i.e. social communism).  Be sure to read about their history and mission.  What is even more startling is their “Achievements” Page.  The typical Jewish communist involvement in racial agitation is extremely prevalent throughout their activities. 

It is important for you to start noticing these similar patterns in Jewish behavior.  Once you become familiar with their goals and rhetoric, it is ridiculously easy to spot their activities.  As I’ve said before, I can literally see a TV program, movie, or news report and immediately predict whether a Jew is involved; just based on the subject matter, their attempt at persuasion, and the predictable wording of it all.  Do you really believe it’s some huge coincidence that so many Jewish groups agitate on behalf of minority communities?  It is insufficient for you to only focus on the superficial aspects of immigration activism.  Without the historical Jewish organizational efforts within these movements, most minority groups would not have the power they have today.  You must always look to the root of the problem. 

Below is a video of protesters trying to interrupt and silence the reporting of Roy Beck of NumbersUSA. It is reported that much of this protesting was organized by the SEIU (Service Employees International Union). In fact, you can see “SEIU” written on the shirt of the whistle-blower in the video.  SEIU is a labor union run by the leftist Jew Andy Stern. Stern was found to be the most frequent visitor to the White House following the release of visitation records. Glenn Beck has done a wealth of reporting on SEIU’s communist activities. Be sure to also watch the short video of Stern below.

This is the reality of political discourse in our society today. Anyone who voices a legitimate argument against massive immigration is not met with debate. Instead they are shouted down, attacked, or discredited with accusations of being a “racist.” Roy beck, who gives a great presentation in this video, predominantly talks about the economic consequences of massive immigration. Apparently if you care about America’s economic future you must be a bigot.

This type of behavior has always been characteristic of the Left. Their arguments are never based in rationality, so intimidation and propaganda become the norm. The biggest problem is that modern conservatives are still concerned with “playing by the rules.” They actually think that if you just give people the facts then the “truth will win.” Unfortunately the Left has never cared about the truth, nor are they intent on playing by the rules; which is why they have gained such a stronghold in American life.

I am reminded of the various early NSDAP rallies in Germany, where communist agitators tried to use similar tactics to disrupt the formation of the new party. But, instead of trying to hold a civil debate with these charlatans (which had proved worthless) the National Socialists met them with physical force. 

Any Stern of SEIU: 

Demographic Armageddon

There is some more troubling news out this week about the future demographics of the United States: 

Minorities make up nearly half the children born in the U.S., part of a historic trend in which minorities are expected to become the U.S. majority over the next 40 years.

In fact, demographers say this year could be the “tipping point” when the number of babies born to minorities outnumbers that of babies born to whites…

http://www.action3news.com/Global/story.asp?S=12114190

So it looks like 2010 could be the first year that babies born to minorities may outnumber the babies born to whites.  Well this is fantastic news huh?  I hate to say I told you so.  Most whites have been totally complacent with this issue because they thought this reality was too far off.  Do you realize that the future of white America is doomed?  You’re children are already a minority. 

The numbers are growing because immigration to the U.S. has boosted the number of Hispanic women in their prime childbearing years. Minorities made up 48 percent of U.S. children born in 2008, the latest census estimates available, compared to 37 percent in 1990.

“Census projections suggest America may become a minority-majority country by the middle of the century.

Yes, the reason is the immigration problem (both legal and illegal) that our government chooses to completely ignore.  Why do they ignore it? - Money and votes.  The Jewish media lambasts any American who speaks out on immigration or race, so every politician avoids it like the plague in order to keep their comfy seat in Washington.  As William Pierce once said, comfort is the great corrupter of men.  He couldn’t have been any more accurate.  No one wants to rock the boat.  No one wants to get out of line.  It is apparently easier for them to piss the future of our race down the toilet than to oppose immigration.  Heck of a deal this democracy, isn’t it?  It will only get worse in the future, when elections will be won by whichever spineless bastard concedes the most to the non-white hordes.

Johnson explained there are now more Hispanic women of prime childbearing age who tend to have more children than women of other races. More white women are waiting until they are older to have children

It’s not only that white women are choosing to wait, but they are also having fewer babies as well.  Why?  Pure materialistic selfishness.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Most of the time when I hear white women talk about having children they are usually complaining about it, like it’s a curse or something.  God forbid you bring some intelligent children into this world and are forced to forego a lifestyle of laziness.  I swear, sometimes I think most white women would rather spend all their time shopping for clothes and watching garbage like “The Bachelor” rather than raising children.  Even when a white couple does have children I usually hear them making excuses to not have any more.  “One or two is plenty for us,” they say.  “Life is just so hard when they are young.” 

Oh really?  Have you forgotten the turmoil that your ancestors suffered just to put you on this planet?  Have you forgot what your forefathers fought and died for?  Do you think they did that so you could live a life of luxury, destroy your race, and hand over your country to a bunch of third-world invaders?  I think not.

The numbers highlight the nation’s growing racial and age divide, seen in pockets of communities across the U.S., which could heighten tensions in current policy debates from immigration reform and education to health care and Social Security.

This is an absolute economic and political firestorm waiting to happen.  As the white population decreases the tax base will shrink.  As the non-white population increases the demand for social services will increase.  Throw America’s debt on top of the scenario and you have economic chaos.  As the minority population increases the government will try their typical Marxist tactic of trying to equalize everyone.  They won’t even realize the folly of their ways until the country is utterly bankrupt, yet the racial achievement gap will still exist.

The Census Bureau is running public service announcements this week to improve its tally of young children, particularly minorities, who are most often missed in the once-a-decade head count. The campaign features Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer, the English- and Spanish-speaking cartoon character who helps “mommy fill out our census form.”

The population figures are used to distribute federal aid and redraw legislative boundaries with racial and ethnic balance, as required by federal law.

Ah Dora the bilingual explorer, how cute.  If you haven’t quite grasped the government’s real intentions with regards to race then read the above quote one more time.  The government is actively trying to subsidize non-whites with the money of whites.  They are using your own productive labor to destroy your children’s future.  This is why there are so many census advertisements targeting minorities.  They want to count as many as possible whether legal or illegal.  The more the merrier.  This means they can throw even more money at an unfixable problem.

Right now, roughly 1 in 10 of the nation’s 3,142 counties already have minority populations greater than 50 percent. But 1 in 4 communities have more minority children than white children or are nearing that point

This makes it sound even worse!  1 in 4 communities have greater than 50% minority children?!  What are you going to do?  Where are you going to move to when the problem continues to get worse?  There won’t be anywhere left to go.  You might as well deal with the problem now before it gets any harder.

The population of Dakota County, Neb., increased from 15 percent minority in 1990 to 54 percent in 2008, due largely to an influx of Hispanics who came looking for work in meatpacking and other labor.

This has happened to far more places in Nebraska than just Dakota county.  Many small Nebraska towns are becoming completely destroyed by immigrant laborers.  The most ironic part of the whole thing is that the city officials always tell the public that bringing a meatpacking plant to town will help create jobs and spur economic development.  Instead it brings in thousands of third-world non-whites, gangs, crime, and non-functional schools.  The whites then pick up and leave. 

The only hope for our country is if we go through an economic depression so bad that it will force white people to get off their obese asses and do some physical labor again.  Maybe when there are no “service jobs” left in our economy whites will be desperate enough to kick out these invaders and take their country back.

Yesterday Israel announced one of it’s most hypocritical actions yet; claiming that they are now pursuing nuclear power for civilian electricity.  In turn Syria, one of Israel’s bitter rivals, also announced they would like to build a nuclear power plant in the future.  However, Israel expects the world to never question their own actions, yet calls for mass condemnation of any Arab country pursuing the same goals:

Israel - which is widely thought to have a secret nuclear weapons program - is unlikely to accept Syrian assurances its program is civilian…..

So, even though Israel has long had a secret nuclear program and possesses up to an estimated 300 nuclear weapons of its own, they cannot stand for any Arab country even building a reactor.

Such construction could also increase pressure on Israel to open its facilities to inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which would shine a spotlight on an area the country has long kept secret.

The Jewish state is used to being accused of nuclear hypocrisy. It demands a nuclear-free Iran when no one doubts Israel has nuclear weapons of its own.

Charges of double standards could intensify - making it harder for Israel to argue that Iran must open all its facilities to world scrutiny…..

Yep, that’s right.  Hypocrisy.  Israel not only wants strict economic sanctions placed on Iran, but is actively lobbying the United States to attack them for pursuing the exact same goals that Israel has in mind.  Even if Iran were trying to develop a nuclear weapon, it is still outrageous considering Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and does not allow any international inspections of them:

Landau said his country (Israel) would open any nuclear power plants to international inspections - but said “we don’t see a reason” to allow inspectors into sites that are believed to house Israel’s nuclear weapons, or to sign the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty….

So let’s get this straight folks.  America’s number one reason for going into Iraq was because Saddam Hussein denied international inspectors full access to facilities, and therefore violated one U.N. resolution.  Despite how today’s “conservatives” claim to hate the U.N., they are now actively supporting a war based on a U.N. resolution - quite ironic isn’t it?  Or maybe it’s just plain stupidity.

Now, after Israel and America have been putting pressure on Iran to open up their facilities to U.N. inspectors, Israel flat-out says that they will not allow inspections of their weapons facilities nor will they sign the non-proliferation treaty.  Absolutely outrageous!  But, the American media doesn’t care.  Nor do they care that there have been over 60 U.N. resolutions condemning Israel, but America goes to war with Iraq over only one resolution.  Without the U.S. to unilaterally veto many of the resolutions, Israel would have well over 90 leveled against them.  No wonder the Arab world hates us.  Could our one-sided support of Israel be any more blatantly obvious?

In 2008, Israeli warplanes struck a Syrian site the U.S. alleged was a plutonium-producing reactor secretly being constructed with help from North Korea….

An Israeli raid in 1981 destroyed Iraq’s partially built Osirak nuclear reactor.

Israel has shown that they will use preemptive force to destroy nuclear facilities in Arab countries.  The U.S. has been complacent with such actions.  But, what do you think would happen if an Arab country launched a strike on Israeli nuclear facilities?  Do you think that America would stay out of it?  Do you think the media would remain unbiased?  Or do you think it would be a catalyst to pull the U.S. into another war for Israel?  I know which one I’d put my money on. 

Landau called Israel’s need for nuclear energy “imminent” but gave no timeline for building a nuclear plant.

Right, it is just assumed that Israel needs to pursue atomic energy to ensure its survival, yet the Left in America has prevented the expansion of U.S. nuclear power despite our own energy crisis.

http://zsidozas.wordpress.com/2009/01/20/obamas-jewschange-we-cant-believe-in/

The next two articles outline the financial and political influence behind the Obama campaign.  You’ll see that Obama received much of his financial and media support from them, not to mention personal guidance as he was becoming a radical Marxist.  The Jews knew that not only would his race serve to soften-up white America even more, but that they were also getting a friend of Israel. (And an easily manipulated moron as president)

Since many of the top advisors to Obama (and many past presidents as well) are Jews, you wonder how the man receives any un-biased information.  The position of president has become nothing more than a front, while Jewish advisors work for Jewish interests in the background.  Is it any surprise how unintelligent our presidents have been?  You know the job is a joke when you have imbeciles like Clinton, Bush, and Obama supposedly running the most powerful country in the world.  Read who is behind Obama here:

http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/who-is-behind-obamas-rise-to-stardom/   

http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/the-zionist-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing/

This was the scene of insurmountable grief after rioters armed with machetes slaughtered more than 500 people in a revenge attack following religious clashes near Nigeria’s city of Jos.

The killers had shown no mercy. They didn’t spare women and children, or even a four-day-old baby, from their machetes.

Rubber-gloved workers pulled ever-smaller bodies from the dump truck and tossed them into the mass grave.

Read Full Article Here

Well, apparently that makes it ok then. You know, throwing away thousands of years of evolution and all. Since when has a society, a race, or an individual achieved greatness solely based on the fact that they were…nice? I can’t point to a single example, but apparently that’s how most white people justify multiculturalism these days. They could never imagine opposing it, because it means they would have to offend the “nice” blacks or the “nice” Hispanics, as if this had any bearing on the eventual outcome. The logic behind this is flawed from the beginning. Everyone knows there are blacks and Hispanics that are good people, but there is absolutely no legitimate means of separating the “good” ones from the “bad” ones.

For example, if a formerly all-white town becomes a target of massive Hispanic immigration, there is no way to adequately screen those immigrants who are “good” from those who are “bad.” The town will then inevitably suffer from higher crime rates and more social ills than it did before. This is because as a group, both blacks and Hispanics have higher rates of crime and anti-social behavior than whites. The same thing goes for the mexican border. You cannot control what type of person gets into the country. It is even harder to screen for those that are of below-average intelligence, or for those who might overuse public services. There is just no possible way to experience the “good” people without experiencing all the “bad” ones as well. This fact is especially guaranteed due to black and Hispanic populations consistently possessing lower IQ’s than whites on average. The only way to deal with the problem is to address it in a statistical manner. If we allow massive immigration, and every major city is destroyed by non-white crime and unproductiveness, then what have we gained? Do the achievements of the “nice” minorities somehow outweigh the destructiveness of the “bad” ones? Of course not, especially when many of the “good” ones still possess below-average intelligence.

Despite what the media tells you, I don’t disagree with mixed-marriages because I “hate” other people. There is a very good reason to oppose such behavior if you care about the future of your country at all. There are some very damaging things that come from a mixed-marriage, other than the fact that it increases the acceptableness of it. If a white person has children with a non-white person they are literally destroying the uniqueness of thousands of years of evolution. Races have been shaped differently by evolution over the millennia because they were exposed to different environmental pressures. Each specific race of people developed in a specific area of the world. It is this segregationist breeding that has produced the different races of mankind. The differences that have developed are great enough to influence the inherent nature of each population. In each race of humans we see significant statistical differences in things such as intelligence, aggressiveness, athletic ability, personality traits, disease rates, drug metabolism, crime rates, bone structure etc. It then comes as no surprise that different races of humans therefore produce different types of societies.

It is no coincidence that every black society (whether it is Haiti, Congo, or Detroit) has striking similarities. It is also no coincidence that the majority of the world’s progress has come from Europe, North America, or Asia. The recognition of the fundamental genetic differences between races is absolutely necessary to understand human behavior. So, when a white person chooses to forego having children with a fellow white, and instead produces offspring with a non-white, they are ending an evolutionary cycle that has been guided by nature for tens of thousands of years. This offspring and their descendents will never be white, and thus not possess certain characteristics at the same rate as whites; whether these are physical, mental, or behavioral. Once this has been done, there’s no turning back. Their ancestors’ unimaginable struggle to survive and reproduce has all been in vain. The cycle stops here.

It’s funny how the same liberals who dedicate their lives to preserving a certain species of animal care nothing about preserving a certain sub-species of humans. If the African Bush Elephant was close to extinction, do you think it would be acceptable to say, “oh that’s ok, let them go extinct because there will be plenty of Asian elephants left.” No, this would never be acceptable because African Bush Elephants and Asian elephants are two distinct species. They are genetically unique from one another, and if you lose one type you will never get it back. It is gone forever. The mere act of preserving the existence of a unique race of people should be reason enough why interracial marriage should be highly discouraged - it actually destroys the diversity created by nature.

Furthermore, when a white person chooses to have children with a black or Hispanic partner, their offspring will have a higher probability of inheriting below-average intelligence and a greater propensity towards crime. As explained in David Duke’s book My Awakening, the IQ’s of the offspring will fall about halfway in between the IQ’s of the two parents on average. And, since blacks and Hispanics possess lower IQ’s per capita, then this will inevitably result in a higher percentage of children being born with lower intelligence. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that this gradual process will have disastrous effects on society in the future.

Another reason to oppose this behavior is because of the mixed-race child’s future mentality. They will never be able to identify with a single race or heritage, which is a cruel thing to do to a child to begin with. But also, they are far more likely to buy into the entire “diversity” agenda, because they are a product of it. They will have a greater probability of growing up promoting racial diversity. They will be a proponent of the racial egalitarian message which is constantly spewed by our mass media. In essence, they grow up becoming part of the problem, not part of the solution. They will be more likely to oppose white racial self-determination.

How will whites ever be able to take control of their own future when thousands of vocal opponents are being born daily? Even more, these children of mixed-marriages frequently grow up to be more productive than members of the non-white parent’s race, making them more acceptable to white people in general. But, this action can never be acceptable because the offspring of mixed-marriages will inevitably produce negative evolutionary effects on society. These are the statistical realities. This is also why it is important to encourage intelligent and productive white people to have children, and not to subsidize the procreation of lower-intelligence whites. Of course, this is exactly opposite of what our government is now doing, which is devastating the quality of the white population as well.

In fact, out of all this talk about niceness, I truly believe that I am showing the most compassion out of anyone. I am only advocating what is best for our children and for future generations. Tell me, what is more compassionate? A society comprised of low intelligence, higher crime, and degeneracy; or a society comprised of higher intelligence, health, and character? You can complain about the ailments of society all you want, but nothing will ever improve if we choose to ignore genetics. The process of reversing this course of genetic decline is not going to be easy, but it is absolutely imperative that it be done. There will surely be nothing nice about it.

I don’t believe most people realize what this truly means.  For decades now, foreign central banks have generally held dollars as reserves, basically in the place of gold.  This was done because at one time the dollar was the world’s most stable currency, mainly due to the fact that IT was backed by gold.  Once we abolished the gold standard (due to our irresponsible spending) the rest of the world naively continued to treat the dollar as if it was still as good as gold. 

These factors have given the U.S. a huge upper hand in global markets.  It has allowed America to forego actual production, and export our inflation instead.  Many of the world’s markets are also exclusively conducted in dollars, including oil.  This privilege we have maintained has led to the complete disregard for domestic manufacturing.  After all, why create anything of real value when all you have to do is borrow or create money, and everyone will accept it.   Due to our lack of domestic production, if this system was suddenly taken away we would not have the capacity to produce the goods needed to maintain the viability of our currency. 

Ironically this scenario is already in the works.  It is becoming apparent to the rest of the world that the U.S. is unable to produce enough to repay our debts.  They are tired of throwing good money after bad, and they are tired of financing our wars for Israel.  Global monetary authorities are proposing that a new basket of currencies be devised in order to replace the dollar’s current status.  This is not hearsay or speculation.  This has been widely reported around the world.  Explore the following Google search to find dozens of articles pertaining to this: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS329US330&q=dollar+reserve+currency

As mentioned in one of the videos below, the initial revaluation of currencies during this process could cause the dollar to lose at least 50% of it’s buying power.  The dollar would then be subject to legitimate valuation, where it’s relative supply and the strength of the U.S. economy would be the determinants of it’s worth; moreso than today at least.  Due to the recent explosion in the U.S. money supply, the dollar could easily end up losing far more than 50% of it’s value if the right steps are not taken.

Can you fathom what this would do to our country?  Our GDP is comprised of over 70% consumer spending, now that we have transitioned into a “service economy.”  Imagine if your paycheck could only buy half of what it currently does, or even less…  This would utterly destroy the U.S. economy and it would take years for us to regain the much-needed productive capacity to improve our standard of living.  Not only that, but think of all the people dependent on the federal government:  employees, state governments, welfare recipients, medicare and social security recipients would all take a hit.  They would see no rise in benefits to keep up with the decline, as the government struggles to meet it’s debt obligations.  You think there is a healthcare crisis now, wait until widespread inflation ensues and no one has the means to pay for it.

There are only a few ways to successfully cope with our current debacle, but none of them are being pursued by our government.  To save the value of our currency extreme spending cuts are needed.  Elimination of entire departments and programs should be pursued as soon as possible.  The future U.S. financial obligations are a catastrophe waiting to happen.  A monstrous rise in taxes will probably eventually be necessary.  I wouldn’t be surprised if one day the government has to completely default on medicare and social security payments. 

Interest rates also need to rise dramatically, probably to the level we saw in the late 1970’s.  If not, the money creation will be too intense to ward off inflation and declining demand for the dollar.  Unfortunately, the spending cuts are a political impossibility and the rise in interest rates would throw our economy into a deep depression.  Our economy survives solely on debt now, and without cheap credit consumption will drop to a fraction of what it is today.  Even more troubling is the fact that if interest rates rise, the interest payments on our national debt follow suit; and the U.S. has no means to meet these short-term payments other than to print new money.

The politically difficult options probably won’t be pursued by the government, which means the Federal Reserve will be forced to “monetize” our debt when no other country is willing to finance it.  It achieves this by buying bonds from the U.S. government, and it prints the money to do so.  When this happens on a large scale there is no stopping the inflation.  One thing is for sure - there is absolutely no easy way out of our current mess.  Disregard what the television pundits are telling you about the false “economic recovery.”  We have not yet seen the real collapse. 

Videos:

In a state like Arizona, Arpaio understands first hand what immigration is doing to his community.  Pro-immigrant groups and various Jewish organizations have been very vocal at denouncing Arpaio’s progress.  These groups would rather see unlimited non-white immigration into our country than any law and order along the border.  It still amazes me though, that White American’s are completely oblivious to the role in which Jews have played in pro-immigration and pro-black movements.  No, Americans can’t be concerned with these details.  They are too busy trying to find new reasons to send our young men off to die for Israel.

A group of Hispanics filed a lawsuit against Arpaio on grounds of racial profiling.  As if race and illegal immigration have no correlation.  By no surprise, the man representing this group of Hispanics is Jewish lawyer Peter Kozinets.  As stated before on this website, the more extreme Jews are about their own racial identity, the more anti-white they are.  It just so happens that Mr. Kozinets is a prominent member of the American Jewish Committee.  His affiliations below are taken from the following website: http://www.steptoe.com/professionals-114.html

If you go on to read his profile on the above site, you’ll see that he has been active in immigration law before - fighting for the immigrants of course. 

The following link is to the American Jewish Committee’s Domestic Policy page:

http://www.ajc.org/site/c.ijITI2PHKoG/b.823785/k.A5C6/Domestic_Policy.htm

If you explore their website along with their positions, you’ll see that the AJC has fervently fought for looser non-white immigration, the abolishment of religion in school, and anti-white multiculturalism.  You’ll also notice their staunch pro-Israel, anti-Muslim positions.  They have many references on their site to “The Iranian Threat” and “Muslim extremists.” 

What?  Why do they not show the tolerance and brotherly love towards Muslims that Whites are supposed to show towards third-world invaders?  Because of the outrageous Jewish double-standard of course!  Think about it for a second.  On one hand, they are fighting for the existence of the Jewish people and for the “Jewish State” of Israel, yet they tell us to accept hoards of foreigners with open arms.  How long do you think a Gentile would last in Israel if they started advocating for unlimited Muslim immigration?  Not long I bet.

The AJC is not alone in the Jewish effort to influence immigration policy.  You’ll find that most major Jewish organizations in America take the same positions.  The ACLU, for example, has played a large role in defending illegal invaders.  I could literally point to hundreds of cases of Jews working to support illegal immigration.  The problem is that White people are too busy sitting in front of their television sets to ever inquire about the people behind this mess.

This situation is yet another example of why our current “democracy” is an utter failure.  These Jewish lawyers use loopholes in the law and agitate to no end.  They eventually win their cases despite the verdicts going against all common sense, not to mention the will of the American people.  Why?  Because there is no practical way to change these open-ended laws without receiving huge condemnation from the mass media.  It will be nearly impossible to enact the necessary legislation to put an end to illegal immigration.  It will just never happen under our current system, especially with the majority of American’s under the spell of the mass media.

Read More About Jewish Influence on our Immigration Page.

Roy Beck and NumbersUSA are not affiliated with Midwest Free Press in any way.

Click here for original article

(THE WELFARE EXAMPLE) Want Smaller Government? You Have To Reduce Immigration

 By Roy Beck, Monday, February 8, 2010, 1:59 PM EST - posted on NumbersUSA

Does the media really expect us to believe that genetics play no role in what we are seeing today in Haiti, considering the same stories appear time after time in Black areas?  Let me ask you this, when is the last time you have seen widespread rape and looting after a natural disaster impacts a White community?  I can’t think of one, yet natural disasters affect White populations all the time.  Even after the tsunami in East Asia, very little of this behavior was seen despite the damage being more widespread than the earthquake in Haiti. 

Instead we see the typical result endemic to Black populations.  The article points out many facts that are absolutely unimaginable to us.  For instance, rape was not even illegal in Haiti until 2005, and the country predictably has the highest AIDS rate in the Western Hemisphere.  Black men are stealing food from their own women and children as the death of their fellow citizens appears to be none of their concern.  Brutal rapes and attacks are becoming commonplace.  There was even a video posted on YouTube showing looters crawling right past dead bodies trapped in rubble in order to steal items.  The natives cannot be trusted to excavate the destruction for the bodies of their fallen citizens, so Western forces must be brought in to do so.  They also cannot be trusted to distribute donated food because theft is so widespread. 

Many leftists will contribute these facts to either “poverty” or “racism.”  But, let’s not forget that Haiti was one of the most productive Caribbean colonies under European rule.  It was not until after the Haitian Revolution, and subsequent Black rule, that led to unproductiveness.  Furthermore,  Whites have not had any influence in the country for over a century, besides the constant humanitarian efforts by White Christians.

One of the most disturbing features to come out of this catastrophe is the reinvigorated White obsession with adopting non-White children.  This, coupled with the American Baptists who recently tried to sneak Haitian children out of the country, shows how truly brainwashed White people are with regards to race.  Many of these Whites choose to have few or no children of their own, yet take on huge financial burdens to care for the children of Blacks.  The parents of these Black children lacked the intelligence and responsibility to adequately prepare for the safety of their offspring.  Now as Black violence rips through most of Africa and Haiti, intelligent White people choose to forego passing on their own genetics, and instead adopt a child which will unfortunately be disadvantaged in our society forever. 

Despite all of the love, care, and monetary support that these White parents might give to their adopted Black children, they will never prosper at the rate which their own White offspring would have.  This, of course, is due solely to genetics and is blatantly obvious to anyone with common sense.  But these White parents will never get it.  They will continue to blame the failures of Blacks on “racism” even as all of their environmental support fails.  There is no doubt that these Black children’s lives will be improved dramatically by coming here, but on average they will never be able to overcome their own genetic limitations.  And at what cost is this done?  How many White children are not being brought into this world, simply because White parents have been brainwashed into thinking that passing on their own genetics is meaningless?  We are truly living in the twilight zone.  Absolutely nothing makes sense anymore. 

Across the globe we see the same general societal scenario, whether it is in Congo, Haiti, or New Orleans.  Commentators will rant and rave about what needs to be done, but none of them will ever be correct.  They will continue to be incorrect as long as they insist on denying the realities of genetic racial differences. 

Read AP Article Here:

Haitian women become crime targets after quake

Video: This is how the people of Haiti treat their fellow citizens.  Warning, graphic content:

Notice how there is no restriction on the Fed’s creation of money. All new money is issued as debt. That means that the “Principal” amount is injected into the economy, but “Principal + Interest” is owed in return. Where does the money to pay this interest come from? Notice at the very end of the video when the narrator assumes that the bond has a 0% interest rate. I was very disappointed at this point. It would have been a perfect opportunity to illustrate the most dangerous part of the entire system.

As we all know, bonds are not issued at 0%. This means that the $1000 used in the video to pay off the bond would not be enough to cover all that is owed, because it doesn’t include the interest. This is the fundamental problem of our debt-based monetary system; the interest charged on newly-created money does not yet exist. This means that in order to pay off the interest, more money must be created; but it is also created as debt. This system requires that new money be created perpetually in order to pay off the interest associated with previously-created money.

So, the overall money supply must grow forever. As I’m sure you all understand, when the money supply is increased with no subsequent increase in production it creates inflation (a rise in prices). This is because more money is now chasing the same number of goods, so it is therefore worth less than before. It dilutes the money supply. Since wages almost never increase at the rate of inflation, this process destroys our buying power and therefore our standard of living. Some people will try and tell you that America enjoys a better standard of living now than ever before. But this is only because of an enormous increase in overall debt. Businesses, households, and consumers in general carry more debt now than ever before. This outcome is completely predictable based on our monetary system, but it is also the only way we are able to afford our standard of living. If the ability to run up debt goes away, then so does our standard of living.

Of course the only way to legitimately increase our standard of living is to actually start producing things once again, rather than just borrowing and consuming. After all, 70% of our economy is based on consumer spending. This is why the government could not let the banking system collapse, because our entire economy is propped up by the enormous bank-created debt. Even more outstanding, as the video shows, if all citizens were to pay off all of their debt there would be a cataclysmic decrease in the money supply to the point where it would freeze the economy. The economy cannot function without money. Either a gold standard, or a debt-free currency could be traded freely within the economy without dependence on debt to ensure it’s existence. As of now, in our current system, we are truly slaves to debt.

Furthermore, as a result of this new money creation, and in order to keep up with it, the economy must also try to grow perpetually. This is completely unsustainable. Not only is it unrealistic to assume an economy can grow forever, but during the process of trying to do so the system consumes everything in it’s path. It cares not about the depletion of natural resources, pollution, sustainability etc. All it cares about is growth. Although the government could simply create new money absolutely debt-free, completely sidestepping a private bank, it instead chooses to pay interest to the Federal Reserve. And for what? What essential service is the Fed providing? What is it doing to earn all of this interest income? Nothing. It has merely been granted the authority by the government to run this giant ponzi scheme. And it does so at the expense of the American people.  Be sure to also look at the chart below as well.

Click on Chart to Enlarge

Above is a 200 year chart of the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  It is what the government uses to keep track of inflation.  However, they don’t include either food nor fuel in the index, two sectors that are incredibly prone to inflation.  These two items also make up a huge portion of the typical American family budget.  Because of these exclusions, among other discrepancies, many people believe that the government consistently understates inflation.  The government has also stopped keeping track of M3, a very accurate measure of the money supply. 

Notice when inflation started getting out of control.  It began in the 1960’s when there was a drastic increase in government spending on “The Great Society” and the Vietnam War.  Because of this the U.S. had to officially break away from the Gold Standard in 1971.  Look at what has happened to consumer prices since 1971.  The chart speaks for itself.

Article Source: CofCC

This must be what the Huffington Post called “queuing for aid” in their attack piece on cofcc.org. Aid convoys must have armed escorts as Haitians fight each other to get the most aid. Even blocking exits with piles of dead bodies to block aid trucks from getting to neighboring towns.

Another shocking development is the refusal of Haitians to help unload their own aid from planes and trucks. The US military is telling private charities and foreign governments they must bring their own work crews and Haitians are refusing to do it. A big story yesterday was about United Airlines flying 60 Chicago volunteers to Haiti to unload planes. It’s unbelievable that in a nation of ten million, white people from Chicago have to be flown all the way to Haiti to unload the planes.

Whenever Haitians are asked to unload anything, they grab as much stuff as they can and run away. In many cases, armed and masked UN soldiers have to hold Haitian thugs back at gun point while UN workers unload trucks.

After the massive tsunami in Southeast Asia, none of the absurd behavior seen in Haiti went on. That disaster was much, much bigger and spread across numerous nations.

Haiti was born of extreme violence. Between 1791 and 1804 all of Haiti’s whites, Mulattoes, and Amerindians were slaughtered in horrifying ways. All non-full blooded Negroes were killed. When Napoleon decided to pull his troops from the Caribbean, it became the only self-ruled Negro “Republic” in the world. Today it is the oldest self-ruled Negro Republic.  Haiti has produced little save for violence and despair since the French left in 1804. It survives on handouts from white nations and white charities.

Today, we see some of the worst behavior from Haiti ever.  While the international community is trying to provide for everyone, the largest and strongest men are seen taking it all. Women, children, and smaller men are pushed aside or even beaten with clubs. Violence it seems is in the Haitian’s genes.

Original Article