“Nice” Is Not An Excuse
Recently I was informed about a young couple that was going to get married. The girl was white and the boy was Hispanic. I was told how bad of a person the girl’s father was, because “he didn’t want his daughter marrying a Mexican.” Simple enough. I responded by saying that I wouldn’t want any of my children marrying outside of their race either. “But this guy is different,” I was told. “He’s a good Mexican. He’s nice.”
Well, apparently that makes it ok then. You know, throwing away thousands of years of evolution and all. Since when has a society, a race, or an individual achieved greatness solely based on the fact that they were…nice? I can’t point to a single example, but apparently that’s how most white people justify multiculturalism these days. They could never imagine opposing it, because it means they would have to offend the “nice” blacks or the “nice” Hispanics, as if this had any bearing on the eventual outcome. The logic behind this is flawed from the beginning. Everyone knows there are blacks and Hispanics that are good people, but there is absolutely no legitimate means of separating the “good” ones from the “bad” ones.
For example, if a formerly all-white town becomes a target of massive Hispanic immigration, there is no way to adequately screen those immigrants who are “good” from those who are “bad.” The town will then inevitably suffer from higher crime rates and more social ills than it did before. This is because as a group, both blacks and Hispanics have higher rates of crime and anti-social behavior than whites. The same thing goes for the mexican border. You cannot control what type of person gets into the country. It is even harder to screen for those that are of below-average intelligence, or for those who might overuse public services. There is just no possible way to experience the “good” people without experiencing all the “bad” ones as well. This fact is especially guaranteed due to black and Hispanic populations consistently possessing lower IQ’s than whites on average. The only way to deal with the problem is to address it in a statistical manner. If we allow massive immigration, and every major city is destroyed by non-white crime and unproductiveness, then what have we gained? Do the achievements of the “nice” minorities somehow outweigh the destructiveness of the “bad” ones? Of course not, especially when many of the “good” ones still possess below-average intelligence.
Despite what the media tells you, I don’t disagree with mixed-marriages because I “hate” other people. There is a very good reason to oppose such behavior if you care about the future of your country at all. There are some very damaging things that come from a mixed-marriage, other than the fact that it increases the acceptableness of it. If a white person has children with a non-white person they are literally destroying the uniqueness of thousands of years of evolution. Races have been shaped differently by evolution over the millennia because they were exposed to different environmental pressures. Each specific race of people developed in a specific area of the world. It is this segregationist breeding that has produced the different races of mankind. The differences that have developed are great enough to influence the inherent nature of each population. In each race of humans we see significant statistical differences in things such as intelligence, aggressiveness, athletic ability, personality traits, disease rates, drug metabolism, crime rates, bone structure etc. It then comes as no surprise that different races of humans therefore produce different types of societies.
It is no coincidence that every black society (whether it is Haiti, Congo, or Detroit) has striking similarities. It is also no coincidence that the majority of the world’s progress has come from Europe, North America, or Asia. The recognition of the fundamental genetic differences between races is absolutely necessary to understand human behavior. So, when a white person chooses to forego having children with a fellow white, and instead produces offspring with a non-white, they are ending an evolutionary cycle that has been guided by nature for tens of thousands of years. This offspring and their descendents will never be white, and thus not possess certain characteristics at the same rate as whites; whether these are physical, mental, or behavioral. Once this has been done, there’s no turning back. Their ancestors’ unimaginable struggle to survive and reproduce has all been in vain. The cycle stops here.
It’s funny how the same liberals who dedicate their lives to preserving a certain species of animal care nothing about preserving a certain sub-species of humans. If the African Bush Elephant was close to extinction, do you think it would be acceptable to say, “oh that’s ok, let them go extinct because there will be plenty of Asian elephants left.” No, this would never be acceptable because African Bush Elephants and Asian elephants are two distinct species. They are genetically unique from one another, and if you lose one type you will never get it back. It is gone forever. The mere act of preserving the existence of a unique race of people should be reason enough why interracial marriage should be highly discouraged - it actually destroys the diversity created by nature.
Furthermore, when a white person chooses to have children with a black or Hispanic partner, their offspring will have a higher probability of inheriting below-average intelligence and a greater propensity towards crime. As explained in David Duke’s book My Awakening, the IQ’s of the offspring will fall about halfway in between the IQ’s of the two parents on average. And, since blacks and Hispanics possess lower IQ’s per capita, then this will inevitably result in a higher percentage of children being born with lower intelligence. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that this gradual process will have disastrous effects on society in the future.
Another reason to oppose this behavior is because of the mixed-race child’s future mentality. They will never be able to identify with a single race or heritage, which is a cruel thing to do to a child to begin with. But also, they are far more likely to buy into the entire “diversity” agenda, because they are a product of it. They will have a greater probability of growing up promoting racial diversity. They will be a proponent of the racial egalitarian message which is constantly spewed by our mass media. In essence, they grow up becoming part of the problem, not part of the solution. They will be more likely to oppose white racial self-determination.
How will whites ever be able to take control of their own future when thousands of vocal opponents are being born daily? Even more, these children of mixed-marriages frequently grow up to be more productive than members of the non-white parent’s race, making them more acceptable to white people in general. But, this action can never be acceptable because the offspring of mixed-marriages will inevitably produce negative evolutionary effects on society. These are the statistical realities. This is also why it is important to encourage intelligent and productive white people to have children, and not to subsidize the procreation of lower-intelligence whites. Of course, this is exactly opposite of what our government is now doing, which is devastating the quality of the white population as well.
In fact, out of all this talk about niceness, I truly believe that I am showing the most compassion out of anyone. I am only advocating what is best for our children and for future generations. Tell me, what is more compassionate? A society comprised of low intelligence, higher crime, and degeneracy; or a society comprised of higher intelligence, health, and character? You can complain about the ailments of society all you want, but nothing will ever improve if we choose to ignore genetics. The process of reversing this course of genetic decline is not going to be easy, but it is absolutely imperative that it be done. There will surely be nothing nice about it.
Filed under: Midwest • Nation • Nebraska • World
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!


3 comments
“How will whites ever be able to take control of their own future when thousands of vocal opponents are being born daily?”
Imagine a jew saying this exact sentence and you have the agenda right there.
Excellent article!
In the Upper Midwest, (where I come from) we have an expression - “Minnesota Nice.”
It used to mean that almost childlike trust that was lavished on vacationers to the ‘land of 10,000 Liberals,’ and it was truly motivated by a gross naivete on the part of the overwhelmingly Scandinavian populace who used to live here…… the idea that everyone was moral, law-abiding, courteous, and wishing no ‘ill will’ on the part of their neighbors.
Not any more. As the home of ‘Lake Woebegon’ becomes the barrio of Nuevo Laredo, or the recesses of Mogadishu North, beginning with the God-damned late Hubert Humphrey and his sponsoring the Jew Celler’s “Immigration Reform Bill of 1965,’ I have (via news reports, and now, from first hand evidence) watched Minnesota become some variant of New Jersey or upstate NY.
Jews seem to be everywhere, and where they are not, there are Blacks (both of the Muslim and generic n*gger kind) or Hispanics. Funny, I never knew Minn- eh-SODA was part of Aztlan????
Anyway, your foolish friend is like so many of the Minnesotans I know who ‘embrace diversity’ when they don’t see that EVERY SINGLE Restaurant now has hispanic wait staff, who a) REFUSE to assimilate- do YOU see English Only signs at your favorite haunts? b) look at you with an insolent stare when they think YOU are not looking at THEM? and c) will- I repeat, WILL destroy this nation in a manner of evil that no negro has been capable of, but they blacks WILL join in the ‘Hate WHitey’ carnage, just as soon as society breaks down far enough!
God’s people were led into Bondage in Ancient Israel for their a) multiculturalism and b) multi-racialism. When a Supreme Court can uphold Anglo-Saxon norms and say ‘We ARE a Christian nation’ to falling to such stable-cleaning lows as hiring on Sonia “Sodomgomorr”, the wrath of God is on a nation that has broken her covenant, and bastardized her seed.
Misericordie Domine.
P.S. “Nice” is a FOUR-letter word.
I used to believe the multicultural line and thought that racial mixing was the next step in evolution. Procreation by diverse races would bring together the strongest/dominant qualities of both races.
Now I see it for what it really is. Eugenics, the creation of a Jew master race and a race of brown multicult slaves. For the social engineers the degradation of white genes, a step down the evolutionary ladder for whites is a step up for non-whites. The thousands of years of white evolutionary advance must be sacrificed for the improvement of non-white DNA.
Mixed races will be easier to control by the “master race.”
Here are a couple of thoughts I’ve had lately.
Are mixed races more prone to homosexuality? And is the function of homosexuality sort of like a genetic shut-off valve for race mixers?