Here is a video released by the BNP (British National Party) showing what massive non-white immigration has done to London. Keep in mind folks, the enemies of Britain can never claim that it is a “country of immigrants” like they do here in America. The British people are the indigenous population and the country is their ancestral homeland. Never would any non-white country voluntarily open up their society to such foreign immigration, yet every white country is told that it is natural for them. We should just accept it because, after all, everyone is the same. You should be asking yourself, “why are no non-white countries taking part in such activities? Why is this agenda only being pushed upon white countries?” The answer becomes clear when you find out who is promoting this agenda.

We are told by our media that this immigration must take place in order for our economy to “keep growing.” Oh really? So how exactly did economies historically function when there was a lack of immigration? Did they just grind to a halt? What was the American middle-class standard of living in 1960 compared to what it is today? The answers to these simple questions show that if massive non-white immigration is needed for our economy, then maybe the structure of our economy is entirely wrong.

Now that President Obama’s Health Care Agenda has been shoved down the throats of the American people, immigration reform is likely the next big controversy. It has been reported that Jewish Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the Neo-con patsy Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have already drafted a comprehensive immigration bill.

Frustrated with the time it has taken for this issue to re-enter the spotlight, illegal alien activist groups held a massive march on Washington this past Sunday. As noted in the article below, many Jewish groups were involved with the rally:

Jewish Groups Join March for Immigration Reform 

American Jewish groups were among 200,000 protesters in Washington demanding comprehensive immigration reform in the United States.

Under the banner of We Were Strangers, Too-the Jewish Campaign for Immigration Reform, Jewish groups including the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism were among the marchers on March 21 from the Hillel International offices in Chinatown joining the protesters on the National Mall.

The rally was organized by Reform Immigration for America Campaign, a coalition of immigrants’ rights groups that want to make immigration reform a top priority for lawmakers in 2010. The cause was put on the back burner as U.S. lawmakers tackled the health care debate.

HIAS and the American Jewish Committee have voiced their support for the Refugee Protection Act of 2010 introduced earlier this month by U.S. Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Carl Levin (Jew) (D-Mich.). The legislation is aimed at improving protections and rights of refugees and asylum seekers.

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=8707

The “We Were Strangers Too” campaign is organized by the HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) and endorsed by many of the largest Jewish organizations in America.  Check out the HIAS homepage here.  A hysterically cheesy promotional video of the campaign was released by the Jewish Council on Urban Affairs.  Check out their website here, and notice their propaganda about “social justice” (i.e. social communism).  Be sure to read about their history and mission.  What is even more startling is their “Achievements” Page.  The typical Jewish communist involvement in racial agitation is extremely prevalent throughout their activities. 

It is important for you to start noticing these similar patterns in Jewish behavior.  Once you become familiar with their goals and rhetoric, it is ridiculously easy to spot their activities.  As I’ve said before, I can literally see a TV program, movie, or news report and immediately predict whether a Jew is involved; just based on the subject matter, their attempt at persuasion, and the predictable wording of it all.  Do you really believe it’s some huge coincidence that so many Jewish groups agitate on behalf of minority communities?  It is insufficient for you to only focus on the superficial aspects of immigration activism.  Without the historical Jewish organizational efforts within these movements, most minority groups would not have the power they have today.  You must always look to the root of the problem. 

Below is a video of protesters trying to interrupt and silence the reporting of Roy Beck of NumbersUSA. It is reported that much of this protesting was organized by the SEIU (Service Employees International Union). In fact, you can see “SEIU” written on the shirt of the whistle-blower in the video.  SEIU is a labor union run by the leftist Jew Andy Stern. Stern was found to be the most frequent visitor to the White House following the release of visitation records. Glenn Beck has done a wealth of reporting on SEIU’s communist activities. Be sure to also watch the short video of Stern below.

This is the reality of political discourse in our society today. Anyone who voices a legitimate argument against massive immigration is not met with debate. Instead they are shouted down, attacked, or discredited with accusations of being a “racist.” Roy beck, who gives a great presentation in this video, predominantly talks about the economic consequences of massive immigration. Apparently if you care about America’s economic future you must be a bigot.

This type of behavior has always been characteristic of the Left. Their arguments are never based in rationality, so intimidation and propaganda become the norm. The biggest problem is that modern conservatives are still concerned with “playing by the rules.” They actually think that if you just give people the facts then the “truth will win.” Unfortunately the Left has never cared about the truth, nor are they intent on playing by the rules; which is why they have gained such a stronghold in American life.

I am reminded of the various early NSDAP rallies in Germany, where communist agitators tried to use similar tactics to disrupt the formation of the new party. But, instead of trying to hold a civil debate with these charlatans (which had proved worthless) the National Socialists met them with physical force. 

Any Stern of SEIU: 

Demographic Armageddon

There is some more troubling news out this week about the future demographics of the United States: 

Minorities make up nearly half the children born in the U.S., part of a historic trend in which minorities are expected to become the U.S. majority over the next 40 years.

In fact, demographers say this year could be the “tipping point” when the number of babies born to minorities outnumbers that of babies born to whites…

http://www.action3news.com/Global/story.asp?S=12114190

So it looks like 2010 could be the first year that babies born to minorities may outnumber the babies born to whites.  Well this is fantastic news huh?  I hate to say I told you so.  Most whites have been totally complacent with this issue because they thought this reality was too far off.  Do you realize that the future of white America is doomed?  You’re children are already a minority. 

The numbers are growing because immigration to the U.S. has boosted the number of Hispanic women in their prime childbearing years. Minorities made up 48 percent of U.S. children born in 2008, the latest census estimates available, compared to 37 percent in 1990.

“Census projections suggest America may become a minority-majority country by the middle of the century.

Yes, the reason is the immigration problem (both legal and illegal) that our government chooses to completely ignore.  Why do they ignore it? - Money and votes.  The Jewish media lambasts any American who speaks out on immigration or race, so every politician avoids it like the plague in order to keep their comfy seat in Washington.  As William Pierce once said, comfort is the great corrupter of men.  He couldn’t have been any more accurate.  No one wants to rock the boat.  No one wants to get out of line.  It is apparently easier for them to piss the future of our race down the toilet than to oppose immigration.  Heck of a deal this democracy, isn’t it?  It will only get worse in the future, when elections will be won by whichever spineless bastard concedes the most to the non-white hordes.

Johnson explained there are now more Hispanic women of prime childbearing age who tend to have more children than women of other races. More white women are waiting until they are older to have children

It’s not only that white women are choosing to wait, but they are also having fewer babies as well.  Why?  Pure materialistic selfishness.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Most of the time when I hear white women talk about having children they are usually complaining about it, like it’s a curse or something.  God forbid you bring some intelligent children into this world and are forced to forego a lifestyle of laziness.  I swear, sometimes I think most white women would rather spend all their time shopping for clothes and watching garbage like “The Bachelor” rather than raising children.  Even when a white couple does have children I usually hear them making excuses to not have any more.  “One or two is plenty for us,” they say.  “Life is just so hard when they are young.” 

Oh really?  Have you forgotten the turmoil that your ancestors suffered just to put you on this planet?  Have you forgot what your forefathers fought and died for?  Do you think they did that so you could live a life of luxury, destroy your race, and hand over your country to a bunch of third-world invaders?  I think not.

The numbers highlight the nation’s growing racial and age divide, seen in pockets of communities across the U.S., which could heighten tensions in current policy debates from immigration reform and education to health care and Social Security.

This is an absolute economic and political firestorm waiting to happen.  As the white population decreases the tax base will shrink.  As the non-white population increases the demand for social services will increase.  Throw America’s debt on top of the scenario and you have economic chaos.  As the minority population increases the government will try their typical Marxist tactic of trying to equalize everyone.  They won’t even realize the folly of their ways until the country is utterly bankrupt, yet the racial achievement gap will still exist.

The Census Bureau is running public service announcements this week to improve its tally of young children, particularly minorities, who are most often missed in the once-a-decade head count. The campaign features Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer, the English- and Spanish-speaking cartoon character who helps “mommy fill out our census form.”

The population figures are used to distribute federal aid and redraw legislative boundaries with racial and ethnic balance, as required by federal law.

Ah Dora the bilingual explorer, how cute.  If you haven’t quite grasped the government’s real intentions with regards to race then read the above quote one more time.  The government is actively trying to subsidize non-whites with the money of whites.  They are using your own productive labor to destroy your children’s future.  This is why there are so many census advertisements targeting minorities.  They want to count as many as possible whether legal or illegal.  The more the merrier.  This means they can throw even more money at an unfixable problem.

Right now, roughly 1 in 10 of the nation’s 3,142 counties already have minority populations greater than 50 percent. But 1 in 4 communities have more minority children than white children or are nearing that point

This makes it sound even worse!  1 in 4 communities have greater than 50% minority children?!  What are you going to do?  Where are you going to move to when the problem continues to get worse?  There won’t be anywhere left to go.  You might as well deal with the problem now before it gets any harder.

The population of Dakota County, Neb., increased from 15 percent minority in 1990 to 54 percent in 2008, due largely to an influx of Hispanics who came looking for work in meatpacking and other labor.

This has happened to far more places in Nebraska than just Dakota county.  Many small Nebraska towns are becoming completely destroyed by immigrant laborers.  The most ironic part of the whole thing is that the city officials always tell the public that bringing a meatpacking plant to town will help create jobs and spur economic development.  Instead it brings in thousands of third-world non-whites, gangs, crime, and non-functional schools.  The whites then pick up and leave. 

The only hope for our country is if we go through an economic depression so bad that it will force white people to get off their obese asses and do some physical labor again.  Maybe when there are no “service jobs” left in our economy whites will be desperate enough to kick out these invaders and take their country back.

The excerpts quoted below are from this article.

Yesterday Israel announced one of it’s most hypocritical actions yet; claiming that they are now pursuing nuclear power for civilian electricity.  In turn Syria, one of Israel’s bitter rivals, also announced they would like to build a nuclear power plant in the future.  However, Israel expects the world to never question their own actions, yet calls for mass condemnation of any Arab country pursuing the same goals:

Israel - which is widely thought to have a secret nuclear weapons program - is unlikely to accept Syrian assurances its program is civilian…..

So, even though Israel has long had a secret nuclear program and possesses up to an estimated 300 nuclear weapons of its own, they cannot stand for any Arab country even building a reactor.

Such construction could also increase pressure on Israel to open its facilities to inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which would shine a spotlight on an area the country has long kept secret.

The Jewish state is used to being accused of nuclear hypocrisy. It demands a nuclear-free Iran when no one doubts Israel has nuclear weapons of its own.

Charges of double standards could intensify - making it harder for Israel to argue that Iran must open all its facilities to world scrutiny…..

Yep, that’s right.  Hypocrisy.  Israel not only wants strict economic sanctions placed on Iran, but is actively lobbying the United States to attack them for pursuing the exact same goals that Israel has in mind.  Even if Iran were trying to develop a nuclear weapon, it is still outrageous considering Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and does not allow any international inspections of them:

Landau said his country (Israel) would open any nuclear power plants to international inspections - but said “we don’t see a reason” to allow inspectors into sites that are believed to house Israel’s nuclear weapons, or to sign the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty….

So let’s get this straight folks.  America’s number one reason for going into Iraq was because Saddam Hussein denied international inspectors full access to facilities, and therefore violated one U.N. resolution.  Despite how today’s “conservatives” claim to hate the U.N., they are now actively supporting a war based on a U.N. resolution - quite ironic isn’t it?  Or maybe it’s just plain stupidity.

Now, after Israel and America have been putting pressure on Iran to open up their facilities to U.N. inspectors, Israel flat-out says that they will not allow inspections of their weapons facilities nor will they sign the non-proliferation treaty.  Absolutely outrageous!  But, the American media doesn’t care.  Nor do they care that there have been over 60 U.N. resolutions condemning Israel, but America goes to war with Iraq over only one resolution.  Without the U.S. to unilaterally veto many of the resolutions, Israel would have well over 90 leveled against them.  No wonder the Arab world hates us.  Could our one-sided support of Israel be any more blatantly obvious?

In 2008, Israeli warplanes struck a Syrian site the U.S. alleged was a plutonium-producing reactor secretly being constructed with help from North Korea….

An Israeli raid in 1981 destroyed Iraq’s partially built Osirak nuclear reactor.

Israel has shown that they will use preemptive force to destroy nuclear facilities in Arab countries.  The U.S. has been complacent with such actions.  But, what do you think would happen if an Arab country launched a strike on Israeli nuclear facilities?  Do you think that America would stay out of it?  Do you think the media would remain unbiased?  Or do you think it would be a catalyst to pull the U.S. into another war for Israel?  I know which one I’d put my money on. 

Landau called Israel’s need for nuclear energy “imminent” but gave no timeline for building a nuclear plant.

Right, it is just assumed that Israel needs to pursue atomic energy to ensure its survival, yet the Left in America has prevented the expansion of U.S. nuclear power despite our own energy crisis.

I recently found a couple links outlining the extent to which Jews are involved in the Obama Administration, not only currently but also in the infancy of his presidential campaign.  The first article points to many of the Jews holding top positions throughout the Obama Administration, the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, the Council on Foreign Relations, etc.  This, my friends, is why the popular conservative pundits will never be right - they refuse to address the significance of the following facts.  The list is far too extensive to re-post it here.  See the full thing at this webpage:

http://zsidozas.wordpress.com/2009/01/20/obamas-jewschange-we-cant-believe-in/

The next two articles outline the financial and political influence behind the Obama campaign.  You’ll see that Obama received much of his financial and media support from them, not to mention personal guidance as he was becoming a radical Marxist.  The Jews knew that not only would his race serve to soften-up white America even more, but that they were also getting a friend of Israel. (And an easily manipulated moron as president)

Since many of the top advisors to Obama (and many past presidents as well) are Jews, you wonder how the man receives any un-biased information.  The position of president has become nothing more than a front, while Jewish advisors work for Jewish interests in the background.  Is it any surprise how unintelligent our presidents have been?  You know the job is a joke when you have imbeciles like Clinton, Bush, and Obama supposedly running the most powerful country in the world.  Read who is behind Obama here:

http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/who-is-behind-obamas-rise-to-stardom/   

http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/the-zionist-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing/

Nigerian villagers wailed in the streets as dump trucks carried hundreds of bodies past burned-out homes towards a mass grave.

This was the scene of insurmountable grief after rioters armed with machetes slaughtered more than 500 people in a revenge attack following religious clashes near Nigeria’s city of Jos.

The killers had shown no mercy. They didn’t spare women and children, or even a four-day-old baby, from their machetes.

Rubber-gloved workers pulled ever-smaller bodies from the dump truck and tossed them into the mass grave.

Read Full Article Here

Recently I was informed about a young couple that was going to get married. The girl was white and the boy was Hispanic. I was told how bad of a person the girl’s father was, because “he didn’t want his daughter marrying a Mexican.” Simple enough. I responded by saying that I wouldn’t want any of my children marrying outside of their race either. “But this guy is different,” I was told. “He’s a good Mexican. He’s nice.”

Well, apparently that makes it ok then. You know, throwing away thousands of years of evolution and all. Since when has a society, a race, or an individual achieved greatness solely based on the fact that they were…nice? I can’t point to a single example, but apparently that’s how most white people justify multiculturalism these days. They could never imagine opposing it, because it means they would have to offend the “nice” blacks or the “nice” Hispanics, as if this had any bearing on the eventual outcome. The logic behind this is flawed from the beginning. Everyone knows there are blacks and Hispanics that are good people, but there is absolutely no legitimate means of separating the “good” ones from the “bad” ones.

For example, if a formerly all-white town becomes a target of massive Hispanic immigration, there is no way to adequately screen those immigrants who are “good” from those who are “bad.” The town will then inevitably suffer from higher crime rates and more social ills than it did before. This is because as a group, both blacks and Hispanics have higher rates of crime and anti-social behavior than whites. The same thing goes for the mexican border. You cannot control what type of person gets into the country. It is even harder to screen for those that are of below-average intelligence, or for those who might overuse public services. There is just no possible way to experience the “good” people without experiencing all the “bad” ones as well. This fact is especially guaranteed due to black and Hispanic populations consistently possessing lower IQ’s than whites on average. The only way to deal with the problem is to address it in a statistical manner. If we allow massive immigration, and every major city is destroyed by non-white crime and unproductiveness, then what have we gained? Do the achievements of the “nice” minorities somehow outweigh the destructiveness of the “bad” ones? Of course not, especially when many of the “good” ones still possess below-average intelligence.

Despite what the media tells you, I don’t disagree with mixed-marriages because I “hate” other people. There is a very good reason to oppose such behavior if you care about the future of your country at all. There are some very damaging things that come from a mixed-marriage, other than the fact that it increases the acceptableness of it. If a white person has children with a non-white person they are literally destroying the uniqueness of thousands of years of evolution. Races have been shaped differently by evolution over the millennia because they were exposed to different environmental pressures. Each specific race of people developed in a specific area of the world. It is this segregationist breeding that has produced the different races of mankind. The differences that have developed are great enough to influence the inherent nature of each population. In each race of humans we see significant statistical differences in things such as intelligence, aggressiveness, athletic ability, personality traits, disease rates, drug metabolism, crime rates, bone structure etc. It then comes as no surprise that different races of humans therefore produce different types of societies.

It is no coincidence that every black society (whether it is Haiti, Congo, or Detroit) has striking similarities. It is also no coincidence that the majority of the world’s progress has come from Europe, North America, or Asia. The recognition of the fundamental genetic differences between races is absolutely necessary to understand human behavior. So, when a white person chooses to forego having children with a fellow white, and instead produces offspring with a non-white, they are ending an evolutionary cycle that has been guided by nature for tens of thousands of years. This offspring and their descendents will never be white, and thus not possess certain characteristics at the same rate as whites; whether these are physical, mental, or behavioral. Once this has been done, there’s no turning back. Their ancestors’ unimaginable struggle to survive and reproduce has all been in vain. The cycle stops here.

It’s funny how the same liberals who dedicate their lives to preserving a certain species of animal care nothing about preserving a certain sub-species of humans. If the African Bush Elephant was close to extinction, do you think it would be acceptable to say, “oh that’s ok, let them go extinct because there will be plenty of Asian elephants left.” No, this would never be acceptable because African Bush Elephants and Asian elephants are two distinct species. They are genetically unique from one another, and if you lose one type you will never get it back. It is gone forever. The mere act of preserving the existence of a unique race of people should be reason enough why interracial marriage should be highly discouraged - it actually destroys the diversity created by nature.

Furthermore, when a white person chooses to have children with a black or Hispanic partner, their offspring will have a higher probability of inheriting below-average intelligence and a greater propensity towards crime. As explained in David Duke’s book My Awakening, the IQ’s of the offspring will fall about halfway in between the IQ’s of the two parents on average. And, since blacks and Hispanics possess lower IQ’s per capita, then this will inevitably result in a higher percentage of children being born with lower intelligence. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that this gradual process will have disastrous effects on society in the future.

Another reason to oppose this behavior is because of the mixed-race child’s future mentality. They will never be able to identify with a single race or heritage, which is a cruel thing to do to a child to begin with. But also, they are far more likely to buy into the entire “diversity” agenda, because they are a product of it. They will have a greater probability of growing up promoting racial diversity. They will be a proponent of the racial egalitarian message which is constantly spewed by our mass media. In essence, they grow up becoming part of the problem, not part of the solution. They will be more likely to oppose white racial self-determination.

How will whites ever be able to take control of their own future when thousands of vocal opponents are being born daily? Even more, these children of mixed-marriages frequently grow up to be more productive than members of the non-white parent’s race, making them more acceptable to white people in general. But, this action can never be acceptable because the offspring of mixed-marriages will inevitably produce negative evolutionary effects on society. These are the statistical realities. This is also why it is important to encourage intelligent and productive white people to have children, and not to subsidize the procreation of lower-intelligence whites. Of course, this is exactly opposite of what our government is now doing, which is devastating the quality of the white population as well.

In fact, out of all this talk about niceness, I truly believe that I am showing the most compassion out of anyone. I am only advocating what is best for our children and for future generations. Tell me, what is more compassionate? A society comprised of low intelligence, higher crime, and degeneracy; or a society comprised of higher intelligence, health, and character? You can complain about the ailments of society all you want, but nothing will ever improve if we choose to ignore genetics. The process of reversing this course of genetic decline is not going to be easy, but it is absolutely imperative that it be done. There will surely be nothing nice about it.

Below are a few videos highlighting the current global financial agenda.  Over the past two years international markets have had to deal with a reckless financial crisis precipitated by U.S. political and monetary policy.  Much of the mainstream media fails to report that the rest of the world is moving away from the U.S. dollar, and it will no longer serve as the world’s reserve currency.  But this should be of no surprise, since the media shuns anything of real substance.

I don’t believe most people realize what this truly means.  For decades now, foreign central banks have generally held dollars as reserves, basically in the place of gold.  This was done because at one time the dollar was the world’s most stable currency, mainly due to the fact that IT was backed by gold.  Once we abolished the gold standard (due to our irresponsible spending) the rest of the world naively continued to treat the dollar as if it was still as good as gold. 

These factors have given the U.S. a huge upper hand in global markets.  It has allowed America to forego actual production, and export our inflation instead.  Many of the world’s markets are also exclusively conducted in dollars, including oil.  This privilege we have maintained has led to the complete disregard for domestic manufacturing.  After all, why create anything of real value when all you have to do is borrow or create money, and everyone will accept it.   Due to our lack of domestic production, if this system was suddenly taken away we would not have the capacity to produce the goods needed to maintain the viability of our currency. 

Ironically this scenario is already in the works.  It is becoming apparent to the rest of the world that the U.S. is unable to produce enough to repay our debts.  They are tired of throwing good money after bad, and they are tired of financing our wars for Israel.  Global monetary authorities are proposing that a new basket of currencies be devised in order to replace the dollar’s current status.  This is not hearsay or speculation.  This has been widely reported around the world.  Explore the following Google search to find dozens of articles pertaining to this: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS329US330&q=dollar+reserve+currency

As mentioned in one of the videos below, the initial revaluation of currencies during this process could cause the dollar to lose at least 50% of it’s buying power.  The dollar would then be subject to legitimate valuation, where it’s relative supply and the strength of the U.S. economy would be the determinants of it’s worth; moreso than today at least.  Due to the recent explosion in the U.S. money supply, the dollar could easily end up losing far more than 50% of it’s value if the right steps are not taken.

Can you fathom what this would do to our country?  Our GDP is comprised of over 70% consumer spending, now that we have transitioned into a “service economy.”  Imagine if your paycheck could only buy half of what it currently does, or even less…  This would utterly destroy the U.S. economy and it would take years for us to regain the much-needed productive capacity to improve our standard of living.  Not only that, but think of all the people dependent on the federal government:  employees, state governments, welfare recipients, medicare and social security recipients would all take a hit.  They would see no rise in benefits to keep up with the decline, as the government struggles to meet it’s debt obligations.  You think there is a healthcare crisis now, wait until widespread inflation ensues and no one has the means to pay for it.

There are only a few ways to successfully cope with our current debacle, but none of them are being pursued by our government.  To save the value of our currency extreme spending cuts are needed.  Elimination of entire departments and programs should be pursued as soon as possible.  The future U.S. financial obligations are a catastrophe waiting to happen.  A monstrous rise in taxes will probably eventually be necessary.  I wouldn’t be surprised if one day the government has to completely default on medicare and social security payments. 

Interest rates also need to rise dramatically, probably to the level we saw in the late 1970’s.  If not, the money creation will be too intense to ward off inflation and declining demand for the dollar.  Unfortunately, the spending cuts are a political impossibility and the rise in interest rates would throw our economy into a deep depression.  Our economy survives solely on debt now, and without cheap credit consumption will drop to a fraction of what it is today.  Even more troubling is the fact that if interest rates rise, the interest payments on our national debt follow suit; and the U.S. has no means to meet these short-term payments other than to print new money.

The politically difficult options probably won’t be pursued by the government, which means the Federal Reserve will be forced to “monetize” our debt when no other country is willing to finance it.  It achieves this by buying bonds from the U.S. government, and it prints the money to do so.  When this happens on a large scale there is no stopping the inflation.  One thing is for sure - there is absolutely no easy way out of our current mess.  Disregard what the television pundits are telling you about the false “economic recovery.”  We have not yet seen the real collapse. 

Videos: