Here are some videos featuring former congressman Jim Traficant.  He is the media’s favorite new whipping boy when it comes to those who criticize Israel.  Since he is fairly unorthodox, and speaks his mind quite readily, many people in the media feel he is a perfect target.  The point being that if you can make those who criticize Israel appear eccentric or crazy, then it further serves as propaganda for the Zionist Neocons.  

Traficant claims he was railroaded into prison by the Justice Department and was targeted by AIPAC for his unwillingness to bow to Jewish lobbying influence.  By any account, it sure is fun watching him get airtime on Fox to expose our Israel-dominated foreign policy.

Below is the video of Hannity’s interview with Traficant.  By watching it closely you can tell it is obviously edited.  It touches on much less than their previous radio interview did.  In the radio interview, Traficant shared figures on American aid to Israel and also told Hannity that he wouldn’t have a show if he actively criticized Israel:

Hannity ferociously claims that Traficant’s assertions about AIPAC political power have no basis in reality.  There are hundreds of resources out on the web proving AIPAC’s tactics, but the following video sums up a lot:

Below is yet another video of typical Black violence.  A Chicago boy is beaten to death by a swarm of Blacks during a gang fight taking place after school.  The media seems to be up in arms about what could have possibly caused this type of behavior to occur.  All day today, pundits of every political persuasion blamed this event on everything from bad parenting to poverty.  What none of these brainwashed, politically correct Whites realize is that this is how Blacks behave on a daily basis, we just happen to have a good video of this particular incident.  Of the hundreds of murders committed by Black thugs in Chicago every year, why should this one surprise us?  One thing I can say for sure; people will never be able to reverse the decline of our civilization without first addressing the reality of the racial problem.  It really is hilarious how the media tries to portray conservative White citizens as violent and hateful, yet we constantly see this type of Black savagery every day.  Caution, this video is graphic:

Black men are the leading cause of death among young blacks.

Article Source: CofCC news

Based on a 96 page report on the causes of premature death by the CDC, the leading cause of death among young blacks of both sexes appears to be black men. See report.

AIDS.

According to the CDC, black men are ten times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV or AIDS than white men. Among black men who allege that they have never engaged in a homosexual act, the figure rises to about 15 times the rate that heterosexual white men are diagnosed. Studies by the CDC also conclude that black men are more likely to have HIV or AIDS and go undiagnosed than white men.

All of this translates to black women being diagnosed with HIV or AIDS at a rate of over 20 times that of white women. The general trend is for black men to catch HIV/AIDS from each other in prison and then give it to black women when they are released. The CDC believes that 74% of black women who have HIV/AIDS contracted it through heterosexual contact with a man.

A 2004 report by the CDC says that AIDS is the:

* the leading cause of death for black women aged 25–34 years.
* the 3rd leading cause of death for black women aged 35–44 years.
* the 4th leading cause of death for black women aged 45–54 years.

By way of comparison, AIDS was only the 11th leading cause of death for white women aged 25-34!

Homicide

The same CDC reports say that homicide is the:

* the leading cause of death among black men aged 15-34 years. (Three age categories!)

* the second leading cause of death for black women aged 15-24 years.
* the fifth leading cause of death for black women aged 25-34 years.

Among women aged 15-24, homicide accounts for 5% of premature deaths in white females, but 20% of all premature deaths by black females.

Among both black and white men, homicide deaths peak at aged 25-34. The death rate by homicide among white men in this age group is 12.5 per 100k, and accounts for 10% of all premature deaths. The death rate by homicide among blacks in this age group is 101.8 per 100k, and accounts for 48% of all premature deaths.

The majority of black female homicide victims are killed by a current or former boyfriend, which many refer to as “femicide.” About 93% of all black homicide victims are killed by a black perpetrator overall. 85% of white homicide victims are killed by a white perpetrator.

“The National Black Women’s Health Project” has identified the battering of women as the number one health issue for African American women (Joseph, 1997).

Femicide is a leading cause of premature deaths in African American women aged 15-44. (Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol 7, No. 1)

In 1998, Salber and Taliaferro reported that the spousal homicide rate among African Americans is 8.4 times more than for whites. The incidence of spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages compared to intraracial marriages. (Source WebMD.com)

Relationships with black men dramatically increase a woman’s chances of dying young.

Black females aged 15-19 are 3.9 times more likely to die of homicide or AIDS than white females in the same age group. This increases to 4.4 time for females aged 20-24 and 7.3 times for 25-34.

White women who engage in relationships with black men dramatically increase their chances of premature death or long term health problems from murder, beatings, and STDs.

The editorial below was written by Leonard Pitts Jr., a Black columnist who holds the predictable viewpoint that any opposition to President Obama’s policies are solely because of his race.  Fitting the “diverse” criteria that he does, Pitts’s articles are carried by a variety of newspapers all across the country.  Not surprisingly, Pitts enlists our favorite Jewish activist, Mark Potok, for commentary on this subject.  Potok has made it his life’s work to attack every pro-Western facet of our society. 

Apparently, earlier this year Potok and the thoroughly Jewish Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) provided ”intelligence” to the Department of Homeland Security.  It is rumored that the DHS based much of their Right Wing Extremism report on this information.  You can read my analysis of the report and the SPLC here. 

In the following excerpts, Potok’s frothing hatred of White America really shows.  From observing this man’s actions and words it eventually becomes obvious how deeply he hates everything about us.  Below, he even goes so far as to say that White people have “completely and utterly lost the battle” to keep our nation White.  That’s funny Mr. Potok, I doubt that most White Americans even realized they were engaged in a “battle” for their survival.  We have always been told by Jews like yourself that “diversity” is all about peace, love, and tolerance. 

It is plain to see that Mark Potok’s war against White America has always been a “battle” to him.  White people had better wake up and realize that the sudden decline in our civilization is not happening merely by coincidence, but instead is due to this immense amount hatred directed at us by Potok and his tribe. 

Potok and many other leftist Jews seem to be giddy with excitement as the prospect of a White racial minority in America becomes imminent.  He even enlightens us with notions that most Whites don’t even currently comprehend; like pointing out the inevitable population shift due to a dismal White fertility rate.

Leonard Pitts Jr.: Opposition based in race for many critics of Obama

“I don’t know who coined the term “culture war” to describe our political divisions, but I’m reasonably sure he or she intended it only as a figure of speech.

It feels like something else in light of a new report from the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors extremist groups. “Terror From the Right” is a listing of bombers, killers, would-be assassins and insurrectionists motivated by anger over abortion, gays, taxes, blacks, Muslims and illegal immigrants.

Which raises an obvious fair and balanced question: What about terror from the left? The SPLC’s Mark Potok says left-wing terror essentially means ecoterrorists, e.g., animal-rights extremists. The death toll from their work, he says, is zero….”

“….For many of them — not all — I think that’s because they find it hard to accept that the new guy is liberal — and black.

As Potok sees it, some of us are angry over the dramatic changes underfoot in this nation. “People who want this country to remain a white-dominated country have lost. They have completely and utterly lost the battle, and they can never win it. If they were to seal the borders tomorrow, whites would still lose their majority in a matter of years, simply as a result of the difference in fertility rate.”

As a result, many people “feel that this is no longer the country that their Christian white forefathers built, that they have been robbed, that this isn’t the world they grew up in and that they are very, very frightened” — a feeling stoked and exploited by political and media demagogues who will loudly disclaim responsibility when that fear becomes violence.

The president is black, the secretary of state is a woman, the new U.S. Supreme Court justice is Hispanic, the nation is changing, becoming vastly more inclusive. If some see that as a redemption of promise, the SPLC report reminds us that others regard it as an embodiment of threat….”

Article Source

Belleville, Illinois - Yet another White student has been beaten by blacks on a school bus.  How many times has this happened?  Just think of all the intimidation that goes on in the school that we don’t observe.  Do you ever see this situation where the races are reversed, and a White student is beating a Black student?  Of course not, yet the media continues to complain about White racism.  I won’t lie to you, this video made my blood boil.  Anyone who has been around Blacks in their natural environment knows all too well of this typical behavior exhibited by them.  The violent emotional outbursts, the acting without thinking, the brutal disregard for any authority; these are characteristics that I have seen Blacks portray thousands of times.  Just watch as the Black students stand and cheer, while the Whites sit there and do absolutely nothing. 

Wake up White people!  You have lost your country!  There was a time not too long ago in America where this type of event would have never happened, and it surely wouldn’t have been tolerated if it did.  Just look at the garbage your children now have to be exposed to, all in the name of diversity.  The police department originally said that this attack appeared to be racially motivated, but later backtracked on the statement.  Please, ask yourself this, if a Black student had been beaten by a raging mob of Whites would this be charged as a hate crime?  You bet it would, because that is the sole reason why hate crime legislation even exists: to target Whites only.  And, that is the reason why the ADL supports this legislation so vigorously.  Read the entire story here.

Video:

Check out the news section of the Plains States ADL office.  They are masters of using misinformation and emotion to persuade people.  They actively lobby our state senators, law enforcement, churches, and even college students to spread their propaganda.  Everything follows the same predictable themes: Anti-white, anti-Christian, pro-diversity, pro-illegal immigration, pro-abortion, pro-gay, and pro-Israel.  Also, notice at the bottom of the page, director Alan Potash issues a statement of correction following the publication of this Midwest Free Press article. 

ADL Newslinks: http://regions.adl.org/plains-states/news/

Newsweek’s War on White People: “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.”

Article Source: CofCC.org News Team

Newsweek just launched an all out war on the mental well-being of white children in their September issue.  The article is titled “See Baby Discriminate.” The article demands, with religious fanaticism, that white children be made to shun all knowledge of racial differences and taught to feel guilty. Newsweek actually printed “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.” The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their own children starting at age 3.

However, amidst the extremist statements by Newsweek, some real bombshells about racial realities are admitted

Here are some highlights:

1. “Kids as young as 6 months judge based on skin color.” – Newsweek
2. White parents, who welcome multiculturalism and embrace diversity, are terrified to talk to their own children about race for fear of what their own children might say.
3. 75% of non-white parents talk to their children about race, compared to only 25% of white parents.
4. White children 5 to 7 attending racially diverse schools universally had a better opinion of their own race than other races.
5. Whites are called on to begin intense multi-cultural indoctrination using videos and parental discussions at age 3, so as not to miss the right “developmental window.”
6. White children should be made to feel guilty for alleged wrongdoings by their race, to increase positive attitudes towards blacks.
7. Black children need to be coached on “ethnic pride” to pump them up and make them more likely to succeed in life.
8. 553 scientists signed a 2007 Supreme Court school amicus brief supporting school desegregation. However, the brief used many qualifiers and only said that desegregation “may” improve black performance. There was no real confidence in desegregation on the part of the scientists.
9. Diverse schools do not lead to more cross-race relationships. In fact the opposite is true. The more diverse a school, the more students self-segregate by race.
10. White children prefer a white Santa Claus and black children prefer a black Santa Claus.

See Article.

What you will see strikingly absent in Newsweek’s whitey hating diatribe of making white children feel guilty and making black children feel proud, is the fact that black children actually have higher self-esteem already than white children. In fact the people with the lowest self-esteem tend to be Orientals.

American Sociological Association (Source)

Past research indicates that black adolescents consistently have higher self-esteem than white students. Other research demonstrates that self-esteem has positive effects on academic achievement. However, black students have lower academic achievement than white students while concurrently exhibiting higher self-esteem.

Within the past couple decades many small Nebraska communities have seen a large influx in immigrant populations, especially cities with meat packing plants.  Historically these immigrants have largely been Hispanic, and they have completely taken over whole towns such as Lexington.  Now many refugees and immigrants from Africa are piling into our state as well.  There has been various murders and other crimes committed by Africans in Lincoln and Omaha, but this violence is now spreading to smaller areas like Grand Island. 

Grand Island’s crime rate is exponentially higher than many similar-sized Nebraska towns, and the police department is struggling to keep up.  This spike in crime is directly related to the increasing number of non-white immigrants.  Of course White people commit crimes too, but not at the higher per capita rate of Hispanics or Africans.  Many of these immigrants have been brought here at the behest of Christian churches.  These do-gooders apparently believe the same persistent egalitarian lie; that if you only change a person’s environment then you automatically change their behavior.  This is because most people have no concept of the power of genetics in influencing human behavior.  Not only has this been proven from a scientific standpoint, but also an empirical one as well.  Africans, no matter where they inhabit, will always have the highest per capita violent crime rate.   

Watch video here: http://new.khastv.com/videoplaylist.php?playid=18328

(8/31/2009) By Adam Lefkoe - It was a busy and all too familiar weekend for Grand Island police. After a murder on Thursday, Saturday and Sunday saw an attempted stabbing, and a strangling all at the same apartment complex.

News 5’s Adam Lefkoe spoke with Somali leaders who said these events are giving innocent people a bad reputation.

It is an issue of safety. Neighbors said they are scared. Many would not talk on camera because of the repercussions. Somali leaders said it is because of people that do not even live in the neighborhood.

For some Grand Island residents, the Autumn Woods Apartment Complex has been the focus of fear.

“I am afraid to walk around the block,” said Clarence Stephens.

It has been a cause for concern for the Grand Island Police Department.

“We are stretched pretty thin. To be honest, we are just scrambling to keep up with things,” said Grand Island Police Chief Steve Lamken.

A man murdered on Thursday, an attempted stabbing Saturday, a woman being strangled Sunday.

“I would say the calls to services are way out of the norm to what we normally deal with,” said Chief Lamken.

A majority of the people living at the complex are either Somali or Sudanese.

A Somali leader spoke with News 5. His identity is hidden for safety reasons.
He said, “Most of the people who live there are not the issue. These people are coming from other places…other cities.”

The Grand Island Police Department agrees.

“I think part of the problem is the folks that we meet with are not the ones causing the problems,” Chief Lamken said.

The Somali leader said the manager of the apartment complex has been trying to fix the issue by kicking out troublemakers.

Because of this he said the murder on Thursday was intended for the apartment manager. He was shot in the foot.

The leader said the attempted stabbing was also meant for the manager.

Grand Island police said they are speaking with the leaders of both the Somali and Sudanese and will continue making arrests.

“We are not going to quit. We are going to continue to try and do what we can to make it better,” said Chief Lamken.

While News 5 was at the apartment complex Monday, there was almost a continuous flow of cars was going in and out of the parking lot.
And there was a strong feeling of danger surrounding it.

One woman driving by yelled that I should be wearing a bulletproof vest.

It is definitely something that has neighbors concerned.

Article Here: http://new.khastv.com/modules/news/article.php?storytopic=4&storyid=18328

Israeli war on Gaza killed 252 children, claims human rights agency

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

The Israeli official figures seriously underestimated the civilian Palestinian death toll exacted during its onslaught in Gaza early this year, according to painstaking research to be published today.

The first detailed casualty figures from an Israeli human rights organisation since the war ended puts the number of children under 16 killed in the offensive at 252 as opposed to the 89 cited by the military. B’Tselem says its fieldworkers gathered death certificates, photos, and testimonies relating to all 252 of the children.

B’Tselem, which said it had carried out “months of meticulous investigation and cross-checks with numerous sources” has, unlike the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), made public the names of all those it said were killed in the war. It said that since the IDF had refused to furnish the agency with its own detailed list, it was impossible to compare the names but that “the blatant discrepancy between the numbers is intolerable.”

The new figures came as it emerged that the Israel Defence Forces have opened a criminal investigation into allegations by Khaled Abed Rabbo and his mother Suad that three of his daughters were shot – two fatally – as the family, carrying a white flag, walked from their house in eastern Jabalya on January 7, early in the military’s ground offensive.

Mr Abed Rabbo testified – including to The Independent two weeks later – that his mother, who was waving a white headscarf, his wife and the three girls were outside the house when a soldier emerged from a tank and opened fire killing Amal, two, Suad, seven, and severely wounding a third, Samar, four, who was evacuated to Belgium for medical treatment.

The investigation followed a formal complaint by three Palestinian legal rights agencies Adalah, Al Haq, and al Mezan. It is one of several still under way into the conduct of Operation Cast Lead, which the IDF and government ministers have repeatedly insisted was conducted according to international law and ethical principles. Mr Abed Rabbo and his mother were interviewed last week at the Erez crossing into Gaza by military police conducting the investigation, al Mezan said.

B’Tselem’s total Palestinian death toll exceeds by more than 200 the 1,166 cited by the IDF after it own survey and closer to, if not quite as high as, the list assembled by Palestinian human rights groups. The IDF insisted when issuing its own figures that 709 or around 60 percent of the dead were “Hamas terror operatives” and that a total of 295 “not involved” Palestinians were killed.

By contrast B’Tselem puts the total figure for those who “did not take part in the hostilities” at 773. One discrepancy is complicated by the fact that the IDF included Hamas police officers, the majority of whom were killed in aerial bombings of police stations at the outset of the offensive, in their list of “terror” operatives, while Palestinian agencies include them as civilians.

B’Tselem lists the dead police officers—of whom it says 248 were killed—as a separate third category. But even if they are included with the 328 whom B’Tselem lists as having been “involved in the hostilities” it comes to 576 –over 100 less than the militants whom the IDF said it killed during the operation.

The agency repeated calls for an “independent and credible investigation” into the military’s conduct of the war. While acknowledging that the numbers did not themselves prove “that Israel violated the laws of war”, they should be considered along with “numerous testimonies” by IDF soldiers and Palestinians during and after the operation.

These raised “grave concerns that Israel breached fundamental principles of international humanitarian law and caused excessive harm to civilians.”

Operation Cast Lead

295 The number of Palestinian civilians Israel estimates were killed in Operation Cast Lead

773 The number of civilians human rights organisation B’Tselem estimates were killed

918 Palestinian Centre for Human Rights’ estimate of number of dead civilians – 65 per cent of their estimated total death count, 1,419

1.5m Population living in Gaza’s 139 square miles

2,360 Minimum number of air strikes executed by Israel Defence Force

Article Source: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/israeli-war-on-gaza-killed-252-children-claims-human-rights-agency-14483864.html#ixzz0QuK0aaYX

Is America Coming Apart?

by Patrick J. Buchanan

Flying home from London, where the subject of formal debate on the 70th anniversary of World War II had been whether Winston Churchill was a liability or asset to the Free World, one arrives in the middle of a far more acrimonious national debate right here in the United States.

At issue: Should Barack Obama be allowed to address tens of millions of American children, inside their classrooms, during school hours?

Conservative talk-show hosts saw a White House scheme to turn public schools into indoctrination centers where the socialist ideology of Obama would be spoon-fed to captive audiences of children forced to listen to Big Brother — and then do assignments on his sermon.

The liberal commentariat raged about right-wing paranoia.

Yet Byron York of The Washington Examiner dug back to 1991 to discover that, when George H.W. Bush went to Alice Deal Junior High to speak to America’s school kids, the left lost it.

“The White House turned a Northwest Washington junior high classroom into a television studio and its students into props,” railed The Washington Post. Education Secretary Lamar Alexander was called before a House committee. The National Education Association denounced Bush. And Congress ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate.

Obama’s actual speech proved about as controversial as a Nancy Reagan appeal to eighth-graders to “Just say no!” to drugs.

Yet, the episode reveals the poisoned character of our politics.

We saw it earlier on display in August, when the crowds that came out for town hall meetings to oppose Obama’s health care plans were called “thugs,” “fascists,” “racists” and “evil-mongers” by national Democrats.

We see it as Rep. Joe Wilson shouts, “You lie!” at the president during his address to a joint session of Congress.

We seem not only to disagree with each other more than ever, but to have come almost to detest one another. Politically, culturally, racially, we seem ever ready to go for each others’ throats.

One half of America sees abortion as the annual slaughter of a million unborn. The other half regards the right-to-life movement as tyrannical and sexist.

Proponents of gay marriage see its adversaries as homophobic bigots. Opponents see its champions as seeking to elevate unnatural and immoral relationships to the sacred state of traditional marriage.

The question invites itself. In what sense are we one nation and one people anymore? For what is a nation if not a people of a common ancestry, faith, culture and language, who worship the same God, revere the same heroes, cherish the same history, celebrate the same holidays, and share the same music, poetry, art and literature?

Yet, today, Mexican-Americans celebrate Cinco de Mayo, a skirmish in a French-Mexican war about which most Americans know nothing, which took place the same year as two of the bloodiest battles of our own Civil War: Antietam and Fredericksburg.

Christmas and Easter, the great holidays of Christendom, once united Americans in joy. Now we fight over whether they should even be mentioned, let alone celebrated, in our public schools.

Where we used to have classical, pop, country & Western and jazz music, now we have varieties tailored to specific generations, races and ethnic groups. Even our music seems designed to subdivide us.

One part of America loves her history, another reviles it as racist, imperialist and genocidal. Old heroes like Columbus, Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee are replaced by Dr. King and Cesar Chavez.

But the old holidays, heroes and icons endure, as the new have yet to put down roots in a recalcitrant Middle America.

We are not only more divided than ever on politics, faith and morality, but along the lines of class and ethnicity. Those who opposed Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court and stood by Sgt. Crowley in the face-off with Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates were called racists. But this time they did not back down. They threw the same vile word right back in the face of their accusers, and Barack Obama.

Consider but a few issues on which Americans have lately been bitterly divided: school prayer, the Ten Commandments, evolution, the death penalty, abortion, homosexuality, assisted suicide, affirmative action, busing, the Confederate battle flag, the Duke rape case, Terri Schiavo, Iraq, amnesty, torture.

Now it is death panels, global warming, “birthers” and socialism. If a married couple disagreed as broadly and deeply as Americans do on such basic issues, they would have divorced and gone their separate ways long ago. What is it that still holds us together?

The European-Christian core of the country that once defined us is shrinking, as Christianity fades, the birth rate falls and Third World immigration surges. Globalism dissolves the economic bonds, while the cacophony of multiculturalism displaces the old American culture.

“E pluribus unum” — out of many, one — was the national motto the men of ‘76 settled upon. One sees the pluribus. But where is the unum? One sees the diversity. But where is the unity?

Is America, too, breaking up?

Article Source: http://buchanan.org/blog/is-america-coming-apart-2159

The full audio of David Duke’s book, My Awakening, is now complete.  Listening to this book is an absolute must for anyone visiting this site, whether you agree with our views or not.  Much of what I write and post on this site will never become fully clear unless you possess the background information found in My Awakening.  I would also argue that anyone who disagrees with our positions is doing themselves a great disservice by not reading/listening to this book before they judge us. 

This is by far the most complete narrative that exists regarding the reality of racial differences, and it is backed up by over a thousand cited resources.  After exploring this information, it will become obvious to you why the concept of race is so important in forming the character of our civilization.  If you are either a beginner or a seasoned veteran on the issue, you owe it to yourself to have this book in your library.  Like I said, concepts discussed on this site such as The Jewish Question, Immigration, Cultural Marxism, and Economics will never truly make sense if you don’t understand the fundamental concept of race.

Below I have posted three separate .zip files for you to download.  After saving them to your computer you simply extract all files onto your hard drive.  You may then play them on your computer, burn them onto an audio CD, or transfer them to an mp3 player.  Feel free to distribute these files to friends and family.  Here is a link to download the book by individual chapters.  To show support for making this audio book available for free, it would not be a bad idea for you to pick up a hard copy here. 

My Awakening Audio Book Part 1 - David Duke

My Awakening Audio Book Part 2 - David Duke

My Awakening Audio Book Part 3 - David Duke

Did Hitler Want War?

by Patrick J. Buchanan

On Sept. 1, 1939, 70 years ago, the German Army crossed the Polish frontier. On Sept. 3, Britain declared war.

Six years later, 50 million Christians and Jews had perished. Britain was broken and bankrupt, Germany a smoldering ruin. Europe had served as the site of the most murderous combat known to man, and civilians had suffered worse horrors than the soldiers.

By May 1945, Red Army hordes occupied all the great capitals of Central Europe: Vienna, Prague, Budapest, Berlin. A hundred million Christians were under the heel of the most barbarous tyranny in history: the Bolshevik regime of the greatest terrorist of them all, Joseph Stalin.

What cause could justify such sacrifices?

The German-Polish war had come out of a quarrel over a town the size of Ocean City, Md., in summer. Danzig, 95 percent German, had been severed from Germany at Versailles in violation of Woodrow Wilson’s principle of self-determination. Even British leaders thought Danzig should be returned.

Why did Warsaw not negotiate with Berlin, which was hinting at an offer of compensatory territory in Slovakia? Because the Poles had a war guarantee from Britain that, should Germany attack, Britain and her empire would come to Poland’s rescue.

But why would Britain hand an unsolicited war guarantee to a junta of Polish colonels, giving them the power to drag Britain into a second war with the most powerful nation in Europe?

Was Danzig worth a war? Unlike the 7 million Hong Kongese whom the British surrendered to Beijing, who didn’t want to go, the Danzigers were clamoring to return to Germany.

Comes the response: The war guarantee was not about Danzig, or even about Poland. It was about the moral and strategic imperative “to stop Hitler” after he showed, by tearing up the Munich pact and Czechoslovakia with it, that he was out to conquer the world. And this Nazi beast could not be allowed to do that.

If true, a fair point. Americans, after all, were prepared to use atom bombs to keep the Red Army from the Channel. But where is the evidence that Adolf Hitler, whose victims as of March 1939 were a fraction of Gen. Pinochet’s, or Fidel Castro’s, was out to conquer the world?

After Munich in 1938, Czechoslovakia did indeed crumble and come apart. Yet consider what became of its parts.

The Sudeten Germans were returned to German rule, as they wished. Poland had annexed the tiny disputed region of Teschen, where thousands of Poles lived. Hungary’s ancestral lands in the south of Slovakia had been returned to her. The Slovaks had their full independence guaranteed by Germany. As for the Czechs, they came to Berlin for the same deal as the Slovaks, but Hitler insisted they accept a protectorate.

Now one may despise what was done, but how did this partition of Czechoslovakia manifest a Hitlerian drive for world conquest?

Comes the reply: If Britain had not given the war guarantee and gone to war, after Czechoslovakia would have come Poland’s turn, then Russia’s, then France’s, then Britain’s, then the United States.

We would all be speaking German now.

But if Hitler was out to conquer the world — Britain, Africa, the Middle East, the United States, Canada, South America, India, Asia, Australia — why did he spend three years building that hugely expensive Siegfried Line to protect Germany from France? Why did he start the war with no surface fleet, no troop transports and only 29 oceangoing submarines? How do you conquer the world with a navy that can’t get out of the Baltic Sea?

If Hitler wanted the world, why did he not build strategic bombers, instead of two-engine Dorniers and Heinkels that could not even reach Britain from Germany?

Why did he let the British army go at Dunkirk?

Why did he offer the British peace, twice, after Poland fell, and again after France fell?

Why, when Paris fell, did Hitler not demand the French fleet, as the Allies demanded and got the Kaiser’s fleet? Why did he not demand bases in French-controlled Syria to attack Suez? Why did he beg Benito Mussolini not to attack Greece?

Because Hitler wanted to end the war in 1940, almost two years before the trains began to roll to the camps.

Hitler had never wanted war with Poland, but an alliance with Poland such as he had with Francisco Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Miklos Horthy’s Hungary and Father Jozef Tiso’s Slovakia.

Indeed, why would he want war when, by 1939, he was surrounded by allied, friendly or neutral neighbors, save France. And he had written off Alsace, because reconquering Alsace meant war with France, and that meant war with Britain, whose empire he admired and whom he had always sought as an ally.

As of March 1939, Hitler did not even have a border with Russia. How then could he invade Russia?

Winston Churchill was right when he called it “The Unnecessary War” — the war that may yet prove the mortal blow to our civilization.

Article Source: http://buchanan.org/blog/did-hitler-want-war-2068

Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. under president Bush, John Bolton, says it is necessary for Israel to attack Iran within a year’s time.  When questioned about whether this action would draw the United States into a larger regional conflict, he acknowledges that this is a strong possibility.  Notice how he purposely foreshadows a possible “Holocaust” if no action is taken.  Is there any better tactic to garner American support than this?  Here is how Wikipedia describes Bolton:

Bolton is currently a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and of counsel to the law firm Kirkland & Ellis, in their Washington D.C. office.^[6] He is also involved with a broad assortment of other conservative think tanks and policy institutes, including the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), Project for the New American Century (PNAC)… Bolton is often described as a neoconservative,^[7][8][9] though he personally rejects the term…

Bolton’s government service included such positions as:

• Assistant Secretary for International Organization Affairs at the Department of State (1989–1993), where he led in the successful effort to rescind the UN resolution from the 1970s that had equated Zionism with racism, and also played a major role in obtaining UN resolutions endorsing the use of force to fight Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Bolton

It appears he doesn’t care if more American soldiers die for Israel’s interests.  It should also be noted that PNAC, AEI, and JINSA were extremely influential in shaping our Iraq policy.  In fact, they already had intentions of invading Iraq long before 9/11.  These organizations were made up exclusively of Zionist Jews and Gentile neocons who comprised much of George W. Bush’s cabinet.  Video: 

As it now seems that you have to be a minority (racial, female, or Jewish) to get a gig in the Obama Administration, take a look at Van Jones, Obama’s new Green Jobs Czar.  Jones is a radical Black communist who is obviously only using his belief in “green energy” to promote the same typical Marxist “social change” we have become accustom to seeing from Black political leaders.  Notice how he uses this speech to promote an egalitarian racial agenda instead.  This man can’t even give a speech about renewable energy without taking a turn into racial politics. 

Furthermore, please observe this man’s use of ebonics during this speech.  This is a highly-paid government official who will be given a good deal of power in our economy, yet he talks as if he is promoting a rap album instead.  Is this how far our culture has sunk?  Are these illiterate Black radicals now the figures our children look up too?  Is this the type of change America wanted?  If it is we are all truly screwed. 

The sad part is that Jones is just one of the many radical Marxists now serving in the Obama administration.  The following speech is 20 minutes long.  I invite you to watch the whole thing if you want, but the real entertaining part is from about 10:00 - 17:00.  Enjoy, these are the type of men who will now dictate the future of our country: