As predicted, now that the gun-grabbers have their elected officials in power, it is an opportune time for a concerted media onslaught against gun ownership.  The media feels it must liken gun ownership to aggressiveness, hatefulness, stupidity, and naivety.  This similar approach has been implemented against every issue of significance to White Americans.  These attacks have already been successful in many ways.  The absolute aversion White people have to thinking racially is largely a product of decades of media bombardment, until we now have reached the point where any type of racial awareness by Whites is automatically equated with evil.  May I remind you that every other race on the planet is allowed to put their group interests first, and it is even portrayed as natural and noble for them to fight for their “rights.”  Black and Hispanic organizations are constantly given credibility while even the simplest White organizations (those that have existed) are not even mentioned in the national news, except when trying to illustrate them as violent rednecks…(continued below)

Part 1

Part 2

This “test” done by ABC’s 20/20 is pathetic by even the most meager standards, and furthermore is nothing but an intentional fraud, meant to pacify those in our country who have not yet formed any real opinion on gun ownership.  Let’s take a closer look at this disgusting piece of propaganda.

When the video first begins, I urge you all to look at the name of the producer, Ann Sorkowitz, a Jew.  The work of Jews in the media has become so predictable and trademarked, that I can literally guess when a Jew is behind a specific show, without ever seeing the production list beforehand.  This skill has almost become 100% proficient, because once you understand their goals and propaganda they stick out like a sore thumb. 

The first fault in this piece of video garbage is evident in the type of moronic students ABC uses in conducting such a test.  There is very little experience to be had among these kids.  Even those that do possess some experience with firearms, they only have stationary range experience and no tactical training.  Most concealed carriers that I know have literally grown up around firearms their entire lives, or seek tactical training as an essential part of their development.  Even by excluding those with such training, you could still find students to use in your test that were not so incapable. 

They emphasize the point that many of these kids loved “video games” and “action movies,” trying to introduce the notion of defending yourself with a weapon as a childish and imaginative idea.  When viewing these students’ training sessions, it becomes evident that they are training them to stand in one place and shoot at a target, not with any tactical knowledge.  Diane Sawyer then points out that this training is even more than what most states require for concealed carry permits.  May I remind Ms. Sawyer that there was a time in this country where virtually no laws inhibited the purchase or carry of firearms, and this corresponded to a much safer period in American history.  Of course, our entire societal structure had not been destroyed by the media at that point, which produced a lesser sense of overall despair among our citizens. 

The instructors first gave these students guns and holsters that they were not familiar with, and that they had very little training with.  In the video, the holster used looks like one that snaps over the back of the gun, which makes it an absolute nightmare to un-holster quickly.  Any competent gun owner would not have picked such a holster, and they would not have been wearing a gigantic white shirt, a helmet, and a pair of gloves while sitting in class.  The producers were setting them up for failure when faced with such a situation.  A concealed carry holder thinks about important things such as holster selection and clothing, and definitely does not foresee shooting their handgun with a helmet and gloves on.

Another fallacy in ABC’s argument was their use of a trained firearms instructor as the attacking gunman.  How many times have we seen a professional weapons expert attack a crowd of students?  Oh that’s right, it’s usually some asocial idiot with a bloodstream full of antidepressants that pulls a stunt like this, not a police officer.  I guarantee you that I could easily outshoot the novice Virginia Tech shooter, or the Binghamton cocaine addict.  Another thing I noticed was that the attacker shot the professor and then turned immediately to face the armed student, obviously already knowing ahead of time which student had the gun.  In a real life situation the attacker would have no idea who is armed, and you are probably more likely to surprise him with your firearm than to illicit a response from him similar to that of a Navy Seal. 

They further talk about tunnel vision and nerves etc.  Do you think a real attacker is going to be a cool cat like this firearms instructor?  Do you think that at the sign of resistance he will keep surging forward like a trained police officer?  Probably not.  The fact that these police officers visibly make it clear to us that they don’t want citizens to be armed shows their arrogance.  So tell me, are we supposed to wait for the police to arrive ten minutes later after half the class has been murdered?  For a clear example on how arming yourself can save your life, watch the video in my previous post entitled, “Shop Owner Fights Back Against Black Crime.”

Another obvious fact that ABC accidentally left out, was that after the student had drawn their weapon the attacker’s full attention was now on them, therefore enabling the rest of the class to escape out the side doors.  Except we don’t see these students portrayed as heroic for placing themselves in harms way while saving the lives of others.  No, they are portrayed as bumbling idiots who “just got themselves killed,” and apparently did so for no good reason.  If I take on an attacker who planned to kill dozens of people, but instead only myself and him die, did I not make it possible for others to live?  Have I not made the ultimate sacrifice?  I guess not in today’s backwards world. 

Diane Sawyer then goes on to point out that “Joey would have been killed in the first five seconds,” and “even though I knew an attack was coming I still couldn’t draw my gun fast enough.”  Again, here we see the subtle attempt at influencing public opinion.  They want the public to think that there is just no use in having a gun, because not only will you get yourself killed but you’ll probably end up shooting your friends as well.  They even show a video of an idiotic Black cop shooting himself in the foot.  The man appears to have the intelligence of scarecrow, and probably attained his job through the aggressive affirmative action policies practiced by most police departments these days.  Furthermore, they make fun of the store clerk who fires at two thugs trying to rob him.  Ms. Sawyer mockingly claims that out of fourteen shots fired no one was even hit.  What she again fails to mention is that the store clerk was not killed, and the robbers stole no money and had to flee instead.

ABC then cuts and pastes interviews of the students, all claiming that they did horrible and any gun training they had wouldn’t have prepared them for such an experience.  They go to great lengths to criticize these novice kids for things like standing up when they weren’t supposed to.  Again, did these students not just allow all the other people in the room to escape?  Not to mention that each student knew they were never in imminent danger considering fake bullets were being used.

This type of biased media coverage was as predictable as it was staged, and it will only get worse with time.  That’s because anyone who understands what is going on right now realizes that it is inevitable.  Our country’s media and government are under the influence of the same people; and these people want to see the White population become a disarmed, uninformed, lazy, fat, and impressionable mass of idiots.  From observing the current condition of our general public, I would say that they are well on their way to achieving this goal.  They want you to be as weak as possible, and without the required energy or knowledge to resist the destruction of your country and culture.

Filed under: Nation

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!

Possibly related posts